AIRLINK 181.89 Decreased By ▼ -1.88 (-1.02%)
BOP 11.18 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.71%)
CNERGY 8.51 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.23%)
CPHL 96.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.44 (-0.46%)
FCCL 46.11 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.13%)
FFL 15.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.32%)
FLYNG 28.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-0.39%)
HUBC 143.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-0.13%)
HUMNL 12.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.77%)
KEL 4.59 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (3.38%)
KOSM 5.90 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (2.25%)
MLCF 65.90 Increased By ▲ 1.33 (2.06%)
OGDC 214.19 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (0.05%)
PACE 6.14 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (2.85%)
PAEL 46.93 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.19%)
PIAHCLA 17.71 Increased By ▲ 0.62 (3.63%)
PIBTL 10.79 Increased By ▲ 0.36 (3.45%)
POWER 12.25 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (1.07%)
PPL 172.96 Increased By ▲ 1.22 (0.71%)
PRL 34.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.32 (-0.93%)
PTC 22.47 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.36%)
SEARL 95.35 Increased By ▲ 2.44 (2.63%)
SSGC 42.58 Increased By ▲ 1.75 (4.29%)
SYM 14.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.35%)
TELE 7.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.41%)
TPLP 9.94 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.7%)
TRG 66.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.45 (-0.68%)
WAVESAPP 9.95 Decreased By ▼ -0.18 (-1.78%)
WTL 1.33 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.76%)
YOUW 3.87 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (2.11%)
AIRLINK 181.89 Decreased By ▼ -1.88 (-1.02%)
BOP 11.18 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.71%)
CNERGY 8.51 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.23%)
CPHL 96.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.44 (-0.46%)
FCCL 46.11 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.13%)
FFL 15.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.32%)
FLYNG 28.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-0.39%)
HUBC 143.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-0.13%)
HUMNL 12.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.77%)
KEL 4.59 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (3.38%)
KOSM 5.90 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (2.25%)
MLCF 65.90 Increased By ▲ 1.33 (2.06%)
OGDC 214.19 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (0.05%)
PACE 6.14 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (2.85%)
PAEL 46.93 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.19%)
PIAHCLA 17.71 Increased By ▲ 0.62 (3.63%)
PIBTL 10.79 Increased By ▲ 0.36 (3.45%)
POWER 12.25 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (1.07%)
PPL 172.96 Increased By ▲ 1.22 (0.71%)
PRL 34.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.32 (-0.93%)
PTC 22.47 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.36%)
SEARL 95.35 Increased By ▲ 2.44 (2.63%)
SSGC 42.58 Increased By ▲ 1.75 (4.29%)
SYM 14.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.35%)
TELE 7.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.41%)
TPLP 9.94 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.7%)
TRG 66.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.45 (-0.68%)
WAVESAPP 9.95 Decreased By ▼ -0.18 (-1.78%)
WTL 1.33 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.76%)
YOUW 3.87 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (2.11%)
BR100 12,625 Increased By 108.6 (0.87%)
BR30 38,078 Increased By 125.2 (0.33%)
KSE100 117,764 Increased By 862.6 (0.74%)
KSE30 36,284 Increased By 351.5 (0.98%)

LAHORE: An appellate forum has upheld a penalty of Rs500,000 imposed on an insurance company for violating various sections of the Insurance Ordinance.

The company was found to be non-compliant with regulations during an on-site inspection conducted in 2020. The inspection revealed violations of sections 12(1)(d) & (e), 12(4), 12(5), and 45(6) of the Ordinance.

According to details, an on-site inspection of the appellant (an insurance company) was conducted to assess compliance with the Insurance Ordinance. The inspection revealed several non-compliances, including violations of sections 12(1)(d) & (e), 12(4), 12(5), and 45(6) of the Ordinance. A show-cause notice was issued and the regulatory authority imposed a penalty of Rs500,000. The company filed an appeal against the penalty, citing force majeure events, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and other factors.

The company cited force majeure events, such as urban flooding in the city, which resulted in the destruction of files and data. It also cited the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic which made it difficult to hold Board meetings and maintain proper records. Further, it explained that it had relocated its records to a new location due to the flooding, but did not obtain prior approval from the Board of Directors. It claimed that it had proactively implemented precautionary measures to mitigate potential future losses, including scanning and preserving digital copies of all documents but the regulatory authority had failed to provide adequate reasoning for imposing the substantial penalty. The relevant appellate forum upheld the penalty, finding that the company’s explanations did not justify the non-compliances. The forum emphasized the importance of regulatory compliance and maintained that the penalty was rightfully imposed.

According to the insurance experts, this decision serves as a reminder to insurance companies to adhere to regulatory requirements and maintain proper records to ensure the integrity and trustworthiness of their operations.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

Comments

Comments are closed.