AGL 37.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.27%)
AIRLINK 124.02 Decreased By ▼ -1.37 (-1.09%)
BOP 5.62 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (1.44%)
CNERGY 3.72 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.8%)
DCL 8.25 Increased By ▲ 0.31 (3.9%)
DFML 40.27 Decreased By ▼ -2.03 (-4.8%)
DGKC 85.74 Decreased By ▼ -2.21 (-2.51%)
FCCL 32.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.65 (-1.95%)
FFBL 66.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.90 (-1.34%)
FFL 10.16 Decreased By ▼ -0.47 (-4.42%)
HUBC 103.10 Decreased By ▼ -2.45 (-2.32%)
HUMNL 13.40 Increased By ▲ 0.55 (4.28%)
KEL 4.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-2.52%)
KOSM 7.18 Decreased By ▼ -0.47 (-6.14%)
MLCF 38.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.58 (-1.49%)
NBP 65.01 Decreased By ▼ -4.49 (-6.46%)
OGDC 173.80 Decreased By ▼ -2.10 (-1.19%)
PAEL 24.90 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.16%)
PIBTL 5.80 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (2.29%)
PPL 142.70 Increased By ▲ 2.95 (2.11%)
PRL 22.98 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-0.69%)
PTC 15.11 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.53%)
SEARL 65.35 Decreased By ▼ -3.65 (-5.29%)
TELE 7.00 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.72%)
TOMCL 36.91 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.11%)
TPLP 7.34 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (1.52%)
TREET 14.28 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.49%)
TRG 49.70 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.1%)
UNITY 26.15 Decreased By ▼ -1.60 (-5.77%)
WTL 1.24 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.8%)
BR100 9,587 Decreased By -108.6 (-1.12%)
BR30 28,507 Decreased By -376.6 (-1.3%)
KSE100 90,287 Decreased By -577.5 (-0.64%)
KSE30 28,343 Decreased By -212.3 (-0.74%)

The Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Friday reserved its judgement in the passport lamination paper contract case. Justice Shaukat Aziz Siddiqui was hearing a petition filed by M/s Reliance International & Co, a local representative of a French company M/s Hologram Industries, through his counsel Salman Akram Raja. The judgement was reserved after Justice Siddiqui was briefed in his chamber by a representative of a US-based firm which had been awarded the contract of provision of lamination paper.
The representative of the US-based firm also briefed Justice Shaukat Aziz Siddiqui about the lamination's security features. Salman Akram Raja, the counsel of the petitioners, opposed the proceedings in the chamber, while the representative of Immigration and Passport (I&P) directorate favoured it.
The petitioner contended that the respondents had awarded the contract to their previous supplier in violation of Public Procurement Regulatory Authority (PPRA) rules. He also said that the contract had been awarded to the US firm at a lower rate. The petitioner has named the federation of Pakistan through the secretary of the Ministry of Interior, Director-General (DG) I&P, Project Director MRPs and Director Database/Secretary Committee, MRP project, DG I&P as respondents in the case.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2013

Comments

Comments are closed.