AGL 39.58 Decreased By ▼ -0.42 (-1.05%)
AIRLINK 131.22 Increased By ▲ 2.16 (1.67%)
BOP 6.81 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.89%)
CNERGY 4.71 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (4.9%)
DCL 8.44 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-1.29%)
DFML 41.47 Increased By ▲ 0.65 (1.59%)
DGKC 82.09 Increased By ▲ 1.13 (1.4%)
FCCL 33.10 Increased By ▲ 0.33 (1.01%)
FFBL 72.87 Decreased By ▼ -1.56 (-2.1%)
FFL 12.26 Increased By ▲ 0.52 (4.43%)
HUBC 110.74 Increased By ▲ 1.16 (1.06%)
HUMNL 14.51 Increased By ▲ 0.76 (5.53%)
KEL 5.19 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-2.26%)
KOSM 7.61 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-1.42%)
MLCF 38.90 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (0.78%)
NBP 64.01 Increased By ▲ 0.50 (0.79%)
OGDC 192.82 Decreased By ▼ -1.87 (-0.96%)
PAEL 25.68 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.12%)
PIBTL 7.34 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.68%)
PPL 154.07 Decreased By ▼ -1.38 (-0.89%)
PRL 25.83 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.16%)
PTC 17.81 Increased By ▲ 0.31 (1.77%)
SEARL 82.30 Increased By ▲ 3.65 (4.64%)
TELE 7.76 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-1.27%)
TOMCL 33.46 Decreased By ▼ -0.27 (-0.8%)
TPLP 8.49 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (1.07%)
TREET 16.62 Increased By ▲ 0.35 (2.15%)
TRG 57.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.82 (-1.41%)
UNITY 27.51 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.07%)
WTL 1.37 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-1.44%)
BR100 10,495 Increased By 50 (0.48%)
BR30 31,202 Increased By 12.3 (0.04%)
KSE100 98,080 Increased By 281.6 (0.29%)
KSE30 30,559 Increased By 78 (0.26%)

The Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Friday reserved its judgement in the passport lamination paper contract case. Justice Shaukat Aziz Siddiqui was hearing a petition filed by M/s Reliance International & Co, a local representative of a French company M/s Hologram Industries, through his counsel Salman Akram Raja. The judgement was reserved after Justice Siddiqui was briefed in his chamber by a representative of a US-based firm which had been awarded the contract of provision of lamination paper.
The representative of the US-based firm also briefed Justice Shaukat Aziz Siddiqui about the lamination's security features. Salman Akram Raja, the counsel of the petitioners, opposed the proceedings in the chamber, while the representative of Immigration and Passport (I&P) directorate favoured it.
The petitioner contended that the respondents had awarded the contract to their previous supplier in violation of Public Procurement Regulatory Authority (PPRA) rules. He also said that the contract had been awarded to the US firm at a lower rate. The petitioner has named the federation of Pakistan through the secretary of the Ministry of Interior, Director-General (DG) I&P, Project Director MRPs and Director Database/Secretary Committee, MRP project, DG I&P as respondents in the case.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2013

Comments

Comments are closed.