AGL 40.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.07%)
AIRLINK 128.25 Increased By ▲ 0.55 (0.43%)
BOP 6.71 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (1.51%)
CNERGY 4.53 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-1.52%)
DCL 9.21 Increased By ▲ 0.42 (4.78%)
DFML 41.58 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
DGKC 87.00 Increased By ▲ 1.21 (1.41%)
FCCL 32.64 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (0.46%)
FFBL 64.52 Increased By ▲ 0.49 (0.77%)
FFL 11.61 Increased By ▲ 1.06 (10.05%)
HUBC 111.73 Increased By ▲ 0.96 (0.87%)
HUMNL 14.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.17 (-1.13%)
KEL 5.02 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (2.87%)
KOSM 7.34 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-1.48%)
MLCF 40.80 Increased By ▲ 0.28 (0.69%)
NBP 61.55 Increased By ▲ 0.50 (0.82%)
OGDC 195.70 Increased By ▲ 0.83 (0.43%)
PAEL 27.55 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.15%)
PIBTL 7.71 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-1.28%)
PPL 152.75 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (0.14%)
PRL 26.84 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (0.98%)
PTC 16.30 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.25%)
SEARL 83.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.64 (-0.76%)
TELE 7.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-1.38%)
TOMCL 36.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.27%)
TPLP 8.95 Increased By ▲ 0.29 (3.35%)
TREET 17.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.66 (-3.74%)
TRG 58.21 Decreased By ▼ -0.41 (-0.7%)
UNITY 27.16 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (1.12%)
WTL 1.33 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-3.62%)
BR100 10,000 No Change 0 (0%)
BR30 31,002 No Change 0 (0%)
KSE100 94,960 Increased By 768 (0.82%)
KSE30 29,500 Increased By 298.4 (1.02%)

Sindh High Court (SHC) had sought submission of explanation about amendments made to the Motor Vehicle Act-2014 within 3 weeks. The amendments and the notification for placing the Motor Vehicle Inspector under Sindh Transport Authority(STA) were challenged in the SHC by Karachi Transport Ittehad (KTI) President Syed Irshad Hussain Bukhari through his lawyer Munsif Jan last week.
The challenger in his petition stated that Sindh Assembly had on May 28, 2014 amended the section 128 of the Sindh Motor Vehicle Act, which was not only against the law but was also against the public interest. He further stated that a notification was in this regard issued for placing the Motor Vehicle Inspector under Sindh Transport Authority while it was not possible that any police officer might perform in Transport Department in full uniform, which was restricted to use in police force. The challenger Bukhari also referred to a ruling of Supreme Court of Pakistan wherein the apex court had declared placement of any officer from other departments as unlawful.

Copyright News Network International, 2014

Comments

Comments are closed.