AGL 37.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.30 (-0.79%)
AIRLINK 128.75 Increased By ▲ 3.68 (2.94%)
BOP 7.23 Increased By ▲ 0.38 (5.55%)
CNERGY 4.56 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (2.47%)
DCL 8.43 Increased By ▲ 0.52 (6.57%)
DFML 38.69 Increased By ▲ 1.35 (3.62%)
DGKC 79.95 Increased By ▲ 2.18 (2.8%)
FCCL 32.00 Increased By ▲ 1.42 (4.64%)
FFBL 73.25 Increased By ▲ 4.39 (6.38%)
FFL 12.30 Increased By ▲ 0.44 (3.71%)
HUBC 109.32 Increased By ▲ 4.82 (4.61%)
HUMNL 14.15 Increased By ▲ 0.66 (4.89%)
KEL 4.97 Increased By ▲ 0.32 (6.88%)
KOSM 7.43 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (3.63%)
MLCF 37.95 Increased By ▲ 1.51 (4.14%)
NBP 70.30 Increased By ▲ 4.38 (6.64%)
OGDC 186.75 Increased By ▲ 7.22 (4.02%)
PAEL 25.09 Increased By ▲ 0.66 (2.7%)
PIBTL 7.40 Increased By ▲ 0.25 (3.5%)
PPL 150.72 Increased By ▲ 7.02 (4.89%)
PRL 25.10 Increased By ▲ 0.78 (3.21%)
PTC 17.09 Increased By ▲ 0.69 (4.21%)
SEARL 81.01 Increased By ▲ 2.44 (3.11%)
TELE 7.50 Increased By ▲ 0.28 (3.88%)
TOMCL 32.55 Increased By ▲ 0.58 (1.81%)
TPLP 8.49 Increased By ▲ 0.36 (4.43%)
TREET 16.47 Increased By ▲ 0.34 (2.11%)
TRG 56.25 Increased By ▲ 1.59 (2.91%)
UNITY 27.75 Increased By ▲ 0.25 (0.91%)
WTL 1.35 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (4.65%)
BR100 10,438 Increased By 348.9 (3.46%)
BR30 30,788 Increased By 1279.5 (4.34%)
KSE100 97,681 Increased By 3106.8 (3.28%)
KSE30 30,464 Increased By 1019.3 (3.46%)

Pakistan’s next government would soon resume the delicate dance that is diplomacy. But circumstances are more challenging this time than they were back in 2013. First, the West seems to be nursing a ‘Pakistan fatigue’ – there is disappointment at the umpteenth failure of democratic governance to take root here. Two, Pakistan’s external finances are coming into trouble in an era of economic warfare. And three, its traditional alliances are at risk from the quirks of the strongmen heading some governments.

Diplomacy is almost dead in the era of Donald J. Trump. More and more leaders are now talking tough in public. In some cases, the hardliner attitude is inspired by Mr. Trump’s fire and fury (e.g. Saudi Arabia’s disputes with Qatar and Canada); in some other cases, it is a reaction to the mercurial president’s tweets (e.g. Turkey’s Erdogan as well as Iran’s Rouhani doubling down their anti-US rhetoric).

But since all politics is essentially local, the hard talk is aimed at addressing domestic audiences. Several electorates have lately caught the bug of nationalism, preferring authoritarian leadership style. Regardless of America’s economic belligerence, key EU powers have held their fire so far. Perhaps the NATO allies are hoping to wait out Trump, who is up for re-election in 2020.

What is more remarkable, though, is that despite many provocations, leaderships in two major authoritarian states, China and Russia, haven’t been quite the rabble-rousers. That is completely rational – the former doesn’t wish to disrupt its prosperity; the latter desperately wishes to find a way back to it.

To its credit, Pakistan has also adopted a rational course in responding to US pressure since Mr. Trump took over the White House. But the US has been unrelenting in its intimidation. First, it dragged Pakistan into the grey-list at the FATF earlier this year. Lately, perhaps sensing two kills with one stone, it has signaled to make it a lot more difficult for Pakistan to access the IMF dollars in the future.

As a means of retaliation, Mr. Trump appears to be deploying the economic playbook with other countries, too. He has kicked up a diplomatic spat with its key ally Turkey, which was already in the middle of a currency crisis. Under a bigger gun, of course, is Iran, which is facing public unrest as sanctions begin to bite after the US turned on the multilateral Iran nuclear accord.

Foreign alliances are seldom without contradictions, due in large part to the complexities in the Middle East. A typical mind-bending diplomatic web of friends and foes goes something like this: Pakistan is friends with Saudi Arabia, which is allied with the US, whose sworn enemy is Iran, whose longtime friend is India, which has fought multiple wars with Pakistan.

At the root of such contradictions is the quest to preserve a country’s economic interest. It will be best for the new government to avoid taking sides and to employ realpolitik in dealing with regional and global powers. Attaining a higher level of exports, which is Pakistan’s lifeline for creating millions of new jobs, also depends on a foreign policy that puts a premium on deepening economic linkages in the region and beyond.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2018

Comments

Comments are closed.