AIRLINK 188.50 Decreased By ▼ -8.15 (-4.14%)
BOP 10.17 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.3%)
CNERGY 6.61 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-1.2%)
FCCL 34.03 Increased By ▲ 1.01 (3.06%)
FFL 16.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.3%)
FLYNG 24.16 Increased By ▲ 1.71 (7.62%)
HUBC 126.20 Decreased By ▼ -1.09 (-0.86%)
HUMNL 13.82 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.58%)
KEL 4.82 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (1.26%)
KOSM 6.50 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (2.04%)
MLCF 43.19 Increased By ▲ 0.97 (2.3%)
OGDC 213.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.01%)
PACE 7.30 Increased By ▲ 0.29 (4.14%)
PAEL 42.19 Increased By ▲ 1.32 (3.23%)
PIAHCLA 17.47 Increased By ▲ 0.65 (3.86%)
PIBTL 8.43 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (1.69%)
POWER 9.00 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (2.04%)
PPL 184.90 Increased By ▲ 1.33 (0.72%)
PRL 38.02 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-0.65%)
PTC 24.25 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (0.75%)
SEARL 94.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.36 (-0.38%)
SILK 1.00 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
SSGC 39.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.71 (-1.76%)
SYM 17.89 Decreased By ▼ -0.32 (-1.76%)
TELE 8.73 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
TPLP 12.50 Increased By ▲ 0.29 (2.38%)
TRG 63.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.46 (-0.71%)
WAVESAPP 10.50 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.57%)
WTL 1.79 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
YOUW 3.98 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.5%)
BR100 11,721 Decreased By -1.9 (-0.02%)
BR30 35,442 Increased By 83 (0.23%)
KSE100 113,073 Increased By 434.6 (0.39%)
KSE30 35,576 Increased By 117.9 (0.33%)

The unlawful practice being exercised by the Directorate of Intelligence and Investigation, (DI&I) Customs-FBR to transfer the custody of seized consignments in most of the cases to the terminal operators has reportedly cost millions to the national exchequer. The issue came on the surface when the Directorate of Internal Audit (DIA) has established an observation on this illicit practice.
According to the observation, which is exclusively available to the daily, revealed that DI&I in most of the cases gave the custody of seized consignments/containers to the terminal operators by taking the shadow of section 169 of the Customs Act 1969. However, the DIA has claimed that there is no such provision is available to authorise the seizing staff to give the seized goods under the custody to the person other than authorised customs officer under section 169 of the Act.
Therefore, the DIA termed the said practice as unlawful, which has so far cost millions to the national exchequer. It further said that there was no record of seized goods in the state warehouse and no one knows the where-about of confiscated goods, due to the said unlawful practice regarding the transfer of its custody to unauthorised authority.
Subsequently, the DIA has directed the DI&I to stop the said practice and urged its senior management to look into the matter and take requisite action to protect the government revenue.
It also suggested the Directorate to carry out study of the cases wherein confiscated goods were still under the custody of irrelevant person other than the officer of customs and take further action to recover the legitimate government revenue. The DIA has not only ordered the DI&I to furnish a detailed report in this regard and submit it within a month but also restricted it to justify this omission and take measures for the auction of confiscated goods.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2016

Comments

Comments are closed.