AIRLINK 209.00 Decreased By ▼ -1.97 (-0.93%)
BOP 10.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.42 (-3.94%)
CNERGY 6.95 Decreased By ▼ -0.46 (-6.21%)
FCCL 33.93 Increased By ▲ 0.36 (1.07%)
FFL 17.46 Decreased By ▼ -0.95 (-5.16%)
FLYNG 22.89 Decreased By ▼ -0.73 (-3.09%)
HUBC 129.79 Decreased By ▼ -1.60 (-1.22%)
HUMNL 13.97 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-0.92%)
KEL 4.84 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-2.81%)
KOSM 6.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.26 (-3.63%)
MLCF 43.58 Decreased By ▼ -0.18 (-0.41%)
OGDC 209.69 Decreased By ▼ -3.87 (-1.81%)
PACE 7.03 Decreased By ▼ -0.42 (-5.64%)
PAEL 39.70 Decreased By ▼ -1.83 (-4.41%)
PIAHCLA 16.98 Decreased By ▼ -0.49 (-2.8%)
PIBTL 8.37 Decreased By ▼ -0.23 (-2.67%)
POWERPS 12.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.08%)
PPL 183.48 Decreased By ▼ -6.12 (-3.23%)
PRL 41.45 Decreased By ▼ -2.86 (-6.45%)
PTC 24.95 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.08%)
SEARL 101.60 Decreased By ▼ -1.77 (-1.71%)
SILK 1.06 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (2.91%)
SSGC 36.99 Decreased By ▼ -3.51 (-8.67%)
SYM 18.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.72 (-3.69%)
TELE 9.05 Decreased By ▼ -0.39 (-4.13%)
TPLP 12.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.65 (-4.81%)
TRG 65.80 Increased By ▲ 1.33 (2.06%)
WAVESAPP 10.38 Decreased By ▼ -0.52 (-4.77%)
WTL 1.61 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-2.42%)
YOUW 4.09 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-2.85%)
BR100 11,878 Decreased By -312.7 (-2.56%)
BR30 35,603 Decreased By -979.4 (-2.68%)
KSE100 114,699 Decreased By -1556.1 (-1.34%)
KSE30 36,034 Decreased By -569.6 (-1.56%)

The Lahore High Court has sought reply from the Punjab government and Higher Education Department by May 29 in a petition challenging appointments of director education (colleges) DG Khan and principal of Government College, Ravi Road. The petitioner, Muhammad Ali Shakuri, pleaded that the government appointed Dr Altaf Hussain as director education (colleges) DG Khan Division and Dr Muhammad Mufakkir as principal of Government College, Ravi Road, in violation of criteria for the posts of professors.
The petitioner's counsel, Nasir Qureshi, argued before the court that the advertisement had required the candidates to submit six research papers in principal journals besides other qualification. The lawyer stated that the research papers submitted by the both respondents were invalid for being published in either ghost or non-recognized journals.

Comments

Comments are closed.