AGL 42.00 Increased By ▲ 3.46 (8.98%)
AIRLINK 129.90 Increased By ▲ 0.40 (0.31%)
BOP 5.75 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (2.5%)
CNERGY 4.03 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (4.4%)
DCL 8.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.34%)
DFML 40.98 Decreased By ▼ -0.78 (-1.87%)
DGKC 88.88 Increased By ▲ 0.58 (0.66%)
FCCL 35.09 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (0.26%)
FFBL 66.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.75 (-1.11%)
FFL 10.77 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (1.51%)
HUBC 109.05 Increased By ▲ 0.29 (0.27%)
HUMNL 14.84 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (1.23%)
KEL 4.76 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.21%)
KOSM 7.27 Increased By ▲ 0.32 (4.6%)
MLCF 42.85 Increased By ▲ 1.20 (2.88%)
NBP 61.00 Increased By ▲ 1.40 (2.35%)
OGDC 180.00 Decreased By ▼ -3.00 (-1.64%)
PAEL 25.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.35 (-1.33%)
PIBTL 6.10 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (2.18%)
PPL 146.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-0.14%)
PRL 23.85 Increased By ▲ 0.24 (1.02%)
PTC 16.65 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (0.54%)
SEARL 71.68 Increased By ▲ 3.38 (4.95%)
TELE 7.30 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.97%)
TOMCL 36.54 Increased By ▲ 0.59 (1.64%)
TPLP 8.03 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (2.29%)
TREET 15.09 Increased By ▲ 0.89 (6.27%)
TRG 50.75 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (0.59%)
UNITY 27.50 Increased By ▲ 0.75 (2.8%)
WTL 1.25 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (3.31%)
BR100 9,867 Increased By 61.2 (0.62%)
BR30 29,807 Increased By 129.3 (0.44%)
KSE100 92,773 Increased By 468.2 (0.51%)
KSE30 28,933 Increased By 93.2 (0.32%)

Lahore High Court (LHC) has made SRO No. 1035(I)/2017, dated 16.10.2017, inapplicable till final outcome of the writ petitions. Under this SRO, regulatory duty (RD) has been charged the rates ranging from 10 to 45% percent on import of 731 listed items. It is learnt that on multiple writ petitions (WP No. 108547 of 2017) filed by the importers, Lahore High Court has granted interim relief, ordering that any regulatory duty to be paid by the petitioners shall be subject to the final outcome of the petitions (importers).
The background of the case is that in order to generate additional revenue the federal government through SRO No. 1035(I)/2017, dated 16.10.2017, issued in pursuance of section 18(3) of the Customs Act, 1969 imposed regulatory duty at the rates ranging from 10 to 45% on import of 731 items listed therein. Certain importers challenged the notification on multiple grounds including that the notification offends the judgement of the Supreme Court of Pakistan in M/s Mustafa Impex vs Government of Pakistan reported as PLD 2016 SC 808 as also that the duties levied through the notification are ex-proprietary and offends the fundamental right of trade and business and treaty in the Constitution.
It was explained to the court that earlier the Supreme Court had held that under the Constitution and rules of business any notification levying any tax or duty is to be issued by the federal government after getting approval from the federal cabinet and any approval given by the concerned minister is void. After the judgement of Supreme Court in Mustafa Impex, certain amendments were made in all the taxing statutes and wherever any delegated powers were given to the federal government the expression was substituted with the board, with the approval of federal minister in-charge. After similar amendments in Section 18(3) of the Customs Act the impugned notification imposing regulatory duty was issued by the Federal Board of Revenue with the approval of federal minister incharge.
In its order, Lahore High Court has said that the counsel for the petitioner lays a challenge to the SRO No. 1035(I)/2017, dated 16.10.2017. According to the counsel, the issuance of this notification offends the judgement of Supreme Court of Pakistan in M/s Mustafa Impex, Karachi & Others vs. Government of Pakistan (PLD 2016 SC 808) as also that the duties levied through this notification are ex-proprietary and offends the fundamental right of trade and business and treaty in the Constitution. Any duty to be paid by the petitioner shall be subject to the final outcome of this petition, the LHC order added.

Comments

Comments are closed.