AIRLINK 200.95 Increased By ▲ 7.39 (3.82%)
BOP 10.16 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (2.11%)
CNERGY 7.73 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-2.52%)
FCCL 40.09 Decreased By ▼ -0.56 (-1.38%)
FFL 16.73 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-0.77%)
FLYNG 26.60 Decreased By ▼ -1.15 (-4.14%)
HUBC 132.61 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.02%)
HUMNL 13.95 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.43%)
KEL 4.66 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (1.3%)
KOSM 6.57 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.76%)
MLCF 46.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.85 (-1.79%)
OGDC 212.19 Decreased By ▼ -1.72 (-0.8%)
PACE 6.87 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.87%)
PAEL 41.21 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.07%)
PIAHCLA 17.01 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-0.82%)
PIBTL 8.09 Decreased By ▼ -0.32 (-3.8%)
POWER 9.39 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-2.59%)
PPL 181.20 Decreased By ▼ -1.15 (-0.63%)
PRL 41.88 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.19%)
PTC 24.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-0.8%)
SEARL 111.35 Increased By ▲ 4.51 (4.22%)
SILK 1.00 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (1.01%)
SSGC 44.00 Increased By ▲ 3.90 (9.73%)
SYM 18.97 Increased By ▲ 1.50 (8.59%)
TELE 8.86 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.23%)
TPLP 12.96 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (1.65%)
TRG 67.26 Increased By ▲ 0.31 (0.46%)
WAVESAPP 11.44 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (0.97%)
WTL 1.80 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.56%)
YOUW 4.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-1.72%)
BR100 12,172 Increased By 127.7 (1.06%)
BR30 36,583 Increased By 3.4 (0.01%)
KSE100 114,794 Increased By 756.2 (0.66%)
KSE30 36,089 Increased By 294.3 (0.82%)

The Lahore High Court on Monday summoned acting general manager of Punjab Saaf Pani Company on September 16 and directed him to explain his position regarding allegations raised by the petitioners who were terminated by the company.
The petitioners Muhammad Amjad and others challenging their removal through Safdar Shaheen advocate contended that the company removed 132 employees on the pretext of financial crunch.
He said the company violated the conditions of the employment contract by terminating services of the petitioners.
He argued that the petitioners were appointed on project posts and their services could not be terminated till the completion of the project.
He also told the court that the acting general manager of the company had been extending threats to the petitioners since they filed the petition. He claimed that the acting general manager also told the petitioners that he would not submit any reply in the court.
He said the conduct of the officer amounted to contempt of court. The court after hearing the counsel said if allegations of the petitioners proved to be true the court would issue a contempt notice to the respondent acting general manager.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2018

Comments

Comments are closed.