AGL 40.03 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.08%)
AIRLINK 127.70 Increased By ▲ 0.66 (0.52%)
BOP 6.61 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.9%)
CNERGY 4.60 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (2%)
DCL 8.79 Increased By ▲ 0.24 (2.81%)
DFML 41.58 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (0.34%)
DGKC 85.79 Decreased By ▼ -1.06 (-1.22%)
FCCL 32.49 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (0.65%)
FFBL 64.03 Decreased By ▼ -0.77 (-1.19%)
FFL 10.55 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (2.93%)
HUBC 110.77 Increased By ▲ 1.20 (1.1%)
HUMNL 15.07 Increased By ▲ 0.39 (2.66%)
KEL 4.88 Decreased By ▼ -0.17 (-3.37%)
KOSM 7.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.13%)
MLCF 40.52 Decreased By ▼ -0.86 (-2.08%)
NBP 61.05 Increased By ▲ 0.64 (1.06%)
OGDC 194.87 Increased By ▲ 4.77 (2.51%)
PAEL 27.51 Decreased By ▼ -0.32 (-1.15%)
PIBTL 7.81 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.26%)
PPL 152.53 Increased By ▲ 2.47 (1.65%)
PRL 26.58 Decreased By ▼ -0.30 (-1.12%)
PTC 16.26 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (1.18%)
SEARL 84.14 Decreased By ▼ -1.86 (-2.16%)
TELE 7.96 Increased By ▲ 0.25 (3.24%)
TOMCL 36.60 Increased By ▲ 1.19 (3.36%)
TPLP 8.66 Increased By ▲ 0.54 (6.65%)
TREET 17.66 Increased By ▲ 1.25 (7.62%)
TRG 58.62 Increased By ▲ 5.33 (10%)
UNITY 26.86 Increased By ▲ 0.70 (2.68%)
WTL 1.38 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (9.52%)
BR100 10,000 No Change 0 (0%)
BR30 31,002 No Change 0 (0%)
KSE100 94,192 No Change 0 (0%)
KSE30 29,201 No Change 0 (0%)

The Lahore High Court on Monday summoned acting general manager of Punjab Saaf Pani Company on September 16 and directed him to explain his position regarding allegations raised by the petitioners who were terminated by the company.
The petitioners Muhammad Amjad and others challenging their removal through Safdar Shaheen advocate contended that the company removed 132 employees on the pretext of financial crunch.
He said the company violated the conditions of the employment contract by terminating services of the petitioners.
He argued that the petitioners were appointed on project posts and their services could not be terminated till the completion of the project.
He also told the court that the acting general manager of the company had been extending threats to the petitioners since they filed the petition. He claimed that the acting general manager also told the petitioners that he would not submit any reply in the court.
He said the conduct of the officer amounted to contempt of court. The court after hearing the counsel said if allegations of the petitioners proved to be true the court would issue a contempt notice to the respondent acting general manager.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2018

Comments

Comments are closed.