AGL 40.44 Increased By ▲ 0.41 (1.02%)
AIRLINK 127.78 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.06%)
BOP 6.75 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (2.12%)
CNERGY 4.49 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-2.39%)
DCL 8.96 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (1.93%)
DFML 41.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.18 (-0.43%)
DGKC 86.50 Increased By ▲ 0.71 (0.83%)
FCCL 32.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.12%)
FFBL 65.02 Increased By ▲ 0.99 (1.55%)
FFL 11.61 Increased By ▲ 1.06 (10.05%)
HUBC 112.61 Increased By ▲ 1.84 (1.66%)
HUMNL 14.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.27 (-1.79%)
KEL 5.04 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (3.28%)
KOSM 7.37 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-1.07%)
MLCF 40.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.17 (-0.42%)
NBP 61.49 Increased By ▲ 0.44 (0.72%)
OGDC 195.87 Increased By ▲ 1.00 (0.51%)
PAEL 27.42 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.33%)
PIBTL 7.34 Decreased By ▼ -0.47 (-6.02%)
PPL 154.00 Increased By ▲ 1.47 (0.96%)
PRL 26.44 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-0.53%)
PTC 16.28 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.12%)
SEARL 85.60 Increased By ▲ 1.46 (1.74%)
TELE 7.77 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-2.39%)
TOMCL 36.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-0.41%)
TPLP 8.93 Increased By ▲ 0.27 (3.12%)
TREET 17.06 Decreased By ▼ -0.60 (-3.4%)
TRG 59.55 Increased By ▲ 0.93 (1.59%)
UNITY 28.81 Increased By ▲ 1.95 (7.26%)
WTL 1.37 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.72%)
BR100 10,127 Increased By 126.8 (1.27%)
BR30 31,302 Increased By 300 (0.97%)
KSE100 95,080 Increased By 888.5 (0.94%)
KSE30 29,529 Increased By 328 (1.12%)

The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has supported a proposal that DISCOs may be allowed either to recover sales tax on tariff differential subsidy from consumers or the federal government should pay sales tax on tariff differential subsidy to distribution companies.
Sources said that the issue of sales tax on power sector subsidy was discussed during a recent meeting held in the context of recovery of sales tax on subsidy from the power sector consumers. Power sector subsidy provided by the federal or provincial governments is not liable to sales tax for being not part of invoice. Therefore, power distribution companies wanted to be allowed either to recover sales tax on tariff differential subsidy from the consumers or Finance Division may provide sales tax on tariff differential subsidy to DISCOs.
On the proposal, the FBR response was that sales tax on tariff differential amount is not being recovered from consumers and the burden cannot be imposed solely on DISCOs. Therefore, it agrees to the suggestion that either DISCOs be allowed to recover sales tax on tariff differential subsidy from the consumers or the government should pay the sales tax to DISCOs on subsidy.
Power Division also supported the proposal and wanted that the Economic Coordination Committee (ECC) may decide the matter that DISCOs may be allowed either to recover sales tax on tariff differential subsidy from consumers or the federal government should pay sales tax on tariff differential subsidy to DISCOs.
The issue of disallowance of input tax credit against transmission and line losses also came under discussion during the meetings on circular debt. There was a proposal from DISCOs that either input tax adjustment may be allowed by a further 50% of differential between actual line losses and those determined by NEPRA or input tax adjustment may be allowed 100% of differential between actual line losses and those determined by NEPRA.
The FBR proposed that input tax adjustment may be allowed by a further 50% of differential between actual line losses and those determined by NEPRA. Petroleum Division also agreed to the FBR proposal. The DISCOs proposed that sales tax to be levied and collected during a tax period, must be on cash collection basis and not on accrual basis, by amending rule of Special Procedure Rules, 2007.
The FBR was of the view that the entire sales tax regime is based on payment of sales tax on accrual basis and creating an exception would invite similar demands from other utility companies such as K-Electric, gas distribution companies and others. The FBR did not agree to the proposal to levy sales tax on cash basis.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2018

Comments

Comments are closed.