AIRLINK 180.17 Decreased By ▼ -1.22 (-0.67%)
BOP 11.42 Increased By ▲ 0.25 (2.24%)
CNERGY 8.55 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.12%)
CPHL 95.23 Increased By ▲ 0.97 (1.03%)
FCCL 46.52 Increased By ▲ 0.34 (0.74%)
FFL 16.30 Increased By ▲ 0.64 (4.09%)
FLYNG 28.70 Increased By ▲ 0.52 (1.85%)
HUBC 145.24 Increased By ▲ 2.47 (1.73%)
HUMNL 13.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-1.06%)
KEL 4.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.66%)
KOSM 5.67 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-2.07%)
MLCF 69.44 Increased By ▲ 3.93 (6%)
OGDC 212.23 Decreased By ▼ -0.65 (-0.31%)
PACE 6.02 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.5%)
PAEL 47.89 Increased By ▲ 1.29 (2.77%)
PIAHCLA 18.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.17 (-0.94%)
PIBTL 10.58 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.28%)
POWER 13.54 Increased By ▲ 1.23 (9.99%)
PPL 170.81 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.05%)
PRL 34.67 Increased By ▲ 0.40 (1.17%)
PTC 22.64 Decreased By ▼ -0.22 (-0.96%)
SEARL 95.83 Increased By ▲ 0.88 (0.93%)
SSGC 43.37 Increased By ▲ 0.90 (2.12%)
SYM 14.19 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
TELE 7.27 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.83%)
TPLP 9.89 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.2%)
TRG 65.60 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.08%)
WAVESAPP 9.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.51%)
WTL 1.33 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.76%)
YOUW 3.74 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.53%)
AIRLINK 180.17 Decreased By ▼ -1.22 (-0.67%)
BOP 11.42 Increased By ▲ 0.25 (2.24%)
CNERGY 8.55 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.12%)
CPHL 95.23 Increased By ▲ 0.97 (1.03%)
FCCL 46.52 Increased By ▲ 0.34 (0.74%)
FFL 16.30 Increased By ▲ 0.64 (4.09%)
FLYNG 28.70 Increased By ▲ 0.52 (1.85%)
HUBC 145.24 Increased By ▲ 2.47 (1.73%)
HUMNL 13.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-1.06%)
KEL 4.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.66%)
KOSM 5.67 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-2.07%)
MLCF 69.44 Increased By ▲ 3.93 (6%)
OGDC 212.23 Decreased By ▼ -0.65 (-0.31%)
PACE 6.02 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.5%)
PAEL 47.89 Increased By ▲ 1.29 (2.77%)
PIAHCLA 18.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.17 (-0.94%)
PIBTL 10.58 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.28%)
POWER 13.54 Increased By ▲ 1.23 (9.99%)
PPL 170.81 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.05%)
PRL 34.67 Increased By ▲ 0.40 (1.17%)
PTC 22.64 Decreased By ▼ -0.22 (-0.96%)
SEARL 95.83 Increased By ▲ 0.88 (0.93%)
SSGC 43.37 Increased By ▲ 0.90 (2.12%)
SYM 14.19 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
TELE 7.27 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.83%)
TPLP 9.89 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.2%)
TRG 65.60 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.08%)
WAVESAPP 9.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.51%)
WTL 1.33 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.76%)
YOUW 3.74 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.53%)
BR100 12,702 Increased By 113.8 (0.9%)
BR30 38,258 Increased By 378.2 (1%)
KSE100 118,383 Increased By 1067.8 (0.91%)
KSE30 36,395 Increased By 278.8 (0.77%)

Silk Bank essentially focuses on what the banks are supposed to do, i.e. private sector lending. An Advances-to-Deposit Ratio (ADR) of 77 percent and Investment-to-Deposit Ratio (IDR) of 24 percent as of March 2014 bears testament to the inclination Silk has towards core banking. However, in 1Q CY14, the bank momentarily changed its stance and focused on investments which grew by 18 percent over December 2013 while advances inched up by just 0.1 percent over the similar period.
Perhaps, Silk is succumbing to the industry-wide of parking its funds for long-term government securities which yielded lucrative yields of over 12 percent on all tenors.
The top line yielded a tremendous year-on-year growth of 22 percent in 1Q CY14. While deposits also grew in the first quarter by a modest 5 percent over December 2013, enhanced focus on low-cost deposits is what that boosted the Net Interest Margin (NIM) by around 2 times and resulted into a spread ratio of 40 percent in 1Q CY14 vis-à-vis 23 percent in the similar period of last year.
Silk’s NPLs fell by 9 percent year on year in CY13 but the bank booked huge provisions in CY13 and in 1Q CY14 too owing to inadequate loan provisioning in the previous year.
Non-mark-up income performed really well in 1Q CY14 will growth mainly triggered by gain on sale of securities. Non-mark-up expenses also impressed whereby they bet the inflation and grew by just 3 percent year on year in 1Q CY14. The bottom line turned to profits vis-à-vis a loss of Rs219 million in 1Q CY13.
Low provisioning in the yesteryears will trigger the bank to book higher provisioning expense and, in effect, will keep diluting the bottom line growth despite any improvement in the asset quality. How well the bank plays with other variables to offset the negative impact of swelling provisioning charges will be the real challenge for the bank.


==============================================================
Silk Bank Limited (Unconsolidated P&L)
==============================================================
Rs (mn) 1QCY14 1QCY13 chg
==============================================================
Markup Earned 2,230 1,822 22%
Markup Expensed 1,347 1,400 -4%
Net Markup Income 882 422 109%
Provisioning/(Reversal) 216 49 340%
Net Markup Income after provisions 666 373 78.6%
Non Mark-up/Interest Income 450 314 43%
Operating Revenues 1,116 687 62%
Non Mark-up/Interest Expenses 1,074 1,042 3%
Profit Before Taxation 42 (355)
Taxation (25) 135
Profit After Taxation 67 (219)
(Loss)/earnings per share 0.03 (0.08)
==============================================================

Source: KSE Notice

Comments

Comments are closed.