AIRLINK 175.55 Decreased By ▼ -2.01 (-1.13%)
BOP 11.01 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.36%)
CNERGY 8.29 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (1.47%)
FCCL 47.23 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.19%)
FFL 16.02 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.62%)
FLYNG 27.31 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.15%)
HUBC 142.32 Decreased By ▼ -4.59 (-3.12%)
HUMNL 13.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-1.55%)
KEL 4.44 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-1.33%)
KOSM 5.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.17%)
MLCF 61.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.22 (-0.35%)
OGDC 226.77 Decreased By ▼ -7.91 (-3.37%)
PACE 5.77 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.52%)
PAEL 44.80 Decreased By ▼ -1.61 (-3.47%)
PIAHCLA 17.88 Decreased By ▼ -0.24 (-1.32%)
PIBTL 10.47 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.95%)
POWER 12.02 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.25%)
PPL 185.92 Decreased By ▼ -5.88 (-3.07%)
PRL 37.16 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-0.43%)
PTC 24.05 Increased By ▲ 0.85 (3.66%)
SEARL 100.29 Decreased By ▼ -0.60 (-0.59%)
SILK 1.15 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
SSGC 38.51 Decreased By ▼ -1.20 (-3.02%)
SYM 14.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.28 (-1.86%)
TELE 7.73 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-1.4%)
TPLP 11.03 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.72%)
TRG 66.00 Decreased By ▼ -1.29 (-1.92%)
WAVESAPP 10.97 Decreased By ▼ -0.38 (-3.35%)
WTL 1.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.74%)
YOUW 3.78 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.27%)
BR100 12,826 Increased By 19.4 (0.15%)
BR30 38,861 Decreased By -842.2 (-2.12%)
KSE100 118,792 Decreased By -146.5 (-0.12%)
KSE30 36,779 Increased By 22.6 (0.06%)

The Economic Coordination Committee recently decided to raise regulatory duty on sugar to 40 percent; its decision drew an instant and strong worded protest by traders through the Karachi Chamber of Commerce. Their argument against this move is that sugar mills interests are being unjustly served; the price of cheap international sugar is raised and the mills get to keep selling at the high prices - a sort of collusion. While this argument holds substance on the surface, there is more to this story.
Firstly, if mills are selling at such exorbitantly high rates to reap profits, why are the balance sheets of so many mills in the negative? BR Research wrote about the problems that the sugar industry is facing earlier this month (see The sugar failure, published July 01, 2015). The problem, in a nutshell, is the unreasonably high support price of sugarcane.
When mills purchase sugarcane at the support price of Rs180 per 40kg, they must sell the sugar at around Rs65-70 just to break even. Reportedly, an overwhelming majority of mills have been selling sugar at losses, between Rs52-54 per kg to traders, who then sell it at the higher price to reap profits.
Secondly, the sugarcane they procure - which forms around 80 percent of their costs - can give varying recovery but is priced the same; a batch of sugarcane which gives a recovery of 3 percent will be equivalent to the batch of cane that gives 9 percent. With mills having such disparities in their recoveries, how can collusion take place?
Finally, consider this; the price of white sugar internationally is around Rs38 per kg, whereas in Pakistan it is at Rs64. A regulatory duty of 40 percent puts the price of imported sugar at around Rs53 per kg. That is still at a discount of Rs11 per kg to the domestic price. So, if anything, the import duty fails to protect sugar mills as it is. Earlier this month, it was reported that sugar stocks in the country are 1.9 million tons. So, there is certainly no need for further sugar imports. However, there is a dire need to cut the support price of cane to bring down this unnecessarily inflated price of sugar, not to mention make mills competitive in the international market and get rid of this surplus stock.

Comments

Comments are closed.