AGL 39.54 Decreased By ▼ -0.46 (-1.15%)
AIRLINK 127.95 Decreased By ▼ -1.11 (-0.86%)
BOP 6.83 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (1.19%)
CNERGY 4.70 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (4.68%)
DCL 8.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.58%)
DFML 41.45 Increased By ▲ 0.63 (1.54%)
DGKC 82.80 Increased By ▲ 1.84 (2.27%)
FCCL 33.02 Increased By ▲ 0.25 (0.76%)
FFBL 73.94 Decreased By ▼ -0.49 (-0.66%)
FFL 11.93 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (1.62%)
HUBC 110.75 Increased By ▲ 1.17 (1.07%)
HUMNL 14.48 Increased By ▲ 0.73 (5.31%)
KEL 5.23 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-1.51%)
KOSM 7.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-1.55%)
MLCF 39.00 Increased By ▲ 0.40 (1.04%)
NBP 64.00 Increased By ▲ 0.49 (0.77%)
OGDC 194.23 Decreased By ▼ -0.46 (-0.24%)
PAEL 25.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-0.82%)
PIBTL 7.40 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.14%)
PPL 155.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-0.13%)
PRL 25.95 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (0.62%)
PTC 18.01 Increased By ▲ 0.51 (2.91%)
SEARL 82.50 Increased By ▲ 3.85 (4.9%)
TELE 7.74 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-1.53%)
TOMCL 33.26 Decreased By ▼ -0.47 (-1.39%)
TPLP 8.52 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (1.43%)
TREET 16.60 Increased By ▲ 0.33 (2.03%)
TRG 56.80 Decreased By ▼ -1.42 (-2.44%)
UNITY 27.63 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (0.51%)
WTL 1.38 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.72%)
BR100 10,551 Increased By 106 (1.01%)
BR30 31,336 Increased By 146.6 (0.47%)
KSE100 98,395 Increased By 596.3 (0.61%)
KSE30 30,684 Increased By 203.1 (0.67%)

The Lahore High Court (LHC) has observed that the courts are guardian of the public, hence could not allow enforcement of penalties against the citizens under contractual terms.
The court observed this while dismissing an appeal filed by Mashreq Bank against its defaulters for recovery of defaulted amount with penalty.
The court also observed that it is a well-established principle of law and legal philosophy that courts refuse to enforce contractual terms prejudice to the borrower, especially in the matters of mortgage.
The steps taken in the process of scrutiny by the banks would be watched by the superior courts closely to ensure that public authority is properly used and is not misused.
The court held that historically equity would not impose harsh conditions on a borrower by the modalities of enforcement chosen by a lender, which could have been avoided, by open enforcement of the contractual rights available to such a lender.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2004

Comments

Comments are closed.