AIRLINK 199.70 Increased By ▲ 2.15 (1.09%)
BOP 10.49 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (2.14%)
CNERGY 7.27 Increased By ▲ 0.32 (4.6%)
FCCL 35.00 Increased By ▲ 0.58 (1.69%)
FFL 17.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.26 (-1.47%)
FLYNG 24.84 Increased By ▲ 0.24 (0.98%)
HUBC 127.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.02%)
HUMNL 13.96 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (0.94%)
KEL 5.07 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (3.89%)
KOSM 6.99 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (4.48%)
MLCF 44.64 Increased By ▲ 0.49 (1.11%)
OGDC 221.66 Decreased By ▼ -3.25 (-1.45%)
PACE 7.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-1.33%)
PAEL 42.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-0.37%)
PIAHCLA 17.44 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (1.28%)
PIBTL 8.46 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.94%)
POWER 9.12 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
PPL 192.25 Decreased By ▼ -2.05 (-1.06%)
PRL 41.55 Increased By ▲ 2.79 (7.2%)
PTC 24.45 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (0.45%)
SEARL 101.40 Increased By ▲ 1.53 (1.53%)
SILK 1.06 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (6%)
SSGC 43.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.02%)
SYM 18.80 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (1.18%)
TELE 9.50 Increased By ▲ 0.38 (4.17%)
TPLP 13.05 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (0.69%)
TRG 66.15 Increased By ▲ 2.05 (3.2%)
WAVESAPP 10.65 Increased By ▲ 0.28 (2.7%)
WTL 1.79 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.56%)
YOUW 4.05 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.75%)
BR100 12,040 Increased By 72 (0.6%)
BR30 36,689 Increased By 5 (0.01%)
KSE100 114,804 Increased By 574.1 (0.5%)
KSE30 36,102 Increased By 118.3 (0.33%)

The Delhi High Court on Friday vacated the interim injunction against the Ten Sports for the supply of feed channel to Hathway Cable and Datacom Pvt Ltd after the Multi System Operator (MSO) said it was not pressing it since the Indo-Pakistan cricket series was being telecast on Doordarsan as per the Supreme Court order.
Justice R C Chopra vacated the March 12 interim order by which the Dubai-based channel and its distributor was directed to continue with the supply of feed channel to the MSO.
The interim order was passed on an application by the Hathway Cable alleging that Ten Sports and its distributor, Cable Distribution Network (CDN), had threatened the disconnection of the supply of feed channel and had demanded exorbitantly enhanced subscription fee which was four times the fee existing under contractual agreement.
The court fixed April 7 to hear the contention of the parties on the main suit.
In the suit, Hathway has contended that by the contractual agreement of May 1, 2003, it was entitled to receive the feed channel against the payment of Rs 5.08 lakh per month till March 31.
However, Ten Sports, in its reply to the suit, had said the agreement between the parties was a determinable contract and the distributor was entitled to terminate that in the event of a breach of a warranty.
The channel has contended that the subscription fee was based on the basis of a per-subscriber-per-month charge of Rs 14 multiplied by a subscriber base of 36,300 subscribers.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2004

Comments

Comments are closed.