AIRLINK 178.00 Decreased By ▼ -3.39 (-1.87%)
BOP 11.13 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.36%)
CNERGY 8.61 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.82%)
CPHL 93.65 Decreased By ▼ -0.61 (-0.65%)
FCCL 45.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.28 (-0.61%)
FFL 15.90 Increased By ▲ 0.24 (1.53%)
FLYNG 28.24 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.21%)
HUBC 143.22 Increased By ▲ 0.45 (0.32%)
HUMNL 13.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-1.06%)
KEL 4.54 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.22%)
KOSM 5.72 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-1.21%)
MLCF 64.95 Decreased By ▼ -0.56 (-0.85%)
OGDC 214.00 Increased By ▲ 1.12 (0.53%)
PACE 6.05 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
PAEL 46.85 Increased By ▲ 0.25 (0.54%)
PIAHCLA 18.37 Increased By ▲ 0.20 (1.1%)
PIBTL 10.78 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (1.6%)
POWER 12.13 Decreased By ▼ -0.18 (-1.46%)
PPL 171.30 Increased By ▲ 0.40 (0.23%)
PRL 33.87 Decreased By ▼ -0.40 (-1.17%)
PTC 22.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-0.48%)
SEARL 94.21 Decreased By ▼ -0.74 (-0.78%)
SSGC 43.56 Increased By ▲ 1.09 (2.57%)
SYM 14.24 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.35%)
TELE 7.23 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.28%)
TPLP 9.95 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.4%)
TRG 65.31 Decreased By ▼ -0.24 (-0.37%)
WAVESAPP 9.90 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.51%)
WTL 1.33 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.76%)
YOUW 3.72 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-1.06%)
AIRLINK 178.00 Decreased By ▼ -3.39 (-1.87%)
BOP 11.13 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.36%)
CNERGY 8.61 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.82%)
CPHL 93.65 Decreased By ▼ -0.61 (-0.65%)
FCCL 45.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.28 (-0.61%)
FFL 15.90 Increased By ▲ 0.24 (1.53%)
FLYNG 28.24 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.21%)
HUBC 143.22 Increased By ▲ 0.45 (0.32%)
HUMNL 13.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-1.06%)
KEL 4.54 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.22%)
KOSM 5.72 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-1.21%)
MLCF 64.95 Decreased By ▼ -0.56 (-0.85%)
OGDC 214.00 Increased By ▲ 1.12 (0.53%)
PACE 6.05 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
PAEL 46.85 Increased By ▲ 0.25 (0.54%)
PIAHCLA 18.37 Increased By ▲ 0.20 (1.1%)
PIBTL 10.78 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (1.6%)
POWER 12.13 Decreased By ▼ -0.18 (-1.46%)
PPL 171.30 Increased By ▲ 0.40 (0.23%)
PRL 33.87 Decreased By ▼ -0.40 (-1.17%)
PTC 22.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-0.48%)
SEARL 94.21 Decreased By ▼ -0.74 (-0.78%)
SSGC 43.56 Increased By ▲ 1.09 (2.57%)
SYM 14.24 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.35%)
TELE 7.23 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.28%)
TPLP 9.95 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.4%)
TRG 65.31 Decreased By ▼ -0.24 (-0.37%)
WAVESAPP 9.90 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.51%)
WTL 1.33 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.76%)
YOUW 3.72 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-1.06%)
BR100 12,690 Increased By 101.9 (0.81%)
BR30 37,966 Increased By 86.8 (0.23%)
KSE100 118,251 Increased By 935.3 (0.8%)
KSE30 36,417 Increased By 300.3 (0.83%)

Educators and education experts have strongly opposed and criticised the proposal for creation of separate army secondary and intermediate boards and expressed fear that the change would provide favourable opportunity to army institutions' students for occupying the seats in medical and engineering colleges.
They said that marking and examination system of federal boards is very poor which provides incapable students to get high marks in the exams compared to Punjab boards of intermediate and secondary education.
Experts feared that as Punjab government has already decided to abolish the entry examination system it would further favour the army institutions' students in getting admissions in professional colleges at wide scale.
Earlier, Federal Secretary Education Shafqat Ezdi during his Multan visit two days back disclosed that Federal Education Ministry was seriously considering separate creation of army secondary and intermediate education boards but his announcement created panic among the educators.
The Federal Secretary also contradicted about removal of Aga Khan education board. They out-rightly rejected the proposal, declared that it would reduce the size of civilian students.
Majority of senior educators strongly opposed the creation of separate army boards and said that army institutions' students by getting poor marking benefits would occupy at least 60 percent to 70 percent seats in professional colleges. The experts opined that
Punjab education boards of secondary and intermediate education are presently responsible for marking, setting question papers and conducting exams of army institutions.
The Punjab education's marking system favours only eligible, hardworking and bright candidates in very tight marking schedule compared to prevailing marking system in federal boards.
Thus it would be quite impossible for the Punjab education boards' candidates to get admissions in professional colleges include medical and engineering colleges due to army's created education boards candidates.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2004

Comments

Comments are closed.