AGL 40.21 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (0.45%)
AIRLINK 127.64 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.05%)
BOP 6.67 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.91%)
CNERGY 4.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-3.26%)
DCL 8.73 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.68%)
DFML 41.16 Decreased By ▼ -0.42 (-1.01%)
DGKC 86.11 Increased By ▲ 0.32 (0.37%)
FCCL 32.56 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.22%)
FFBL 64.38 Increased By ▲ 0.35 (0.55%)
FFL 11.61 Increased By ▲ 1.06 (10.05%)
HUBC 112.46 Increased By ▲ 1.69 (1.53%)
HUMNL 14.81 Decreased By ▼ -0.26 (-1.73%)
KEL 5.04 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (3.28%)
KOSM 7.36 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-1.21%)
MLCF 40.33 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-0.47%)
NBP 61.08 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.05%)
OGDC 194.18 Decreased By ▼ -0.69 (-0.35%)
PAEL 26.91 Decreased By ▼ -0.60 (-2.18%)
PIBTL 7.28 Decreased By ▼ -0.53 (-6.79%)
PPL 152.68 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (0.1%)
PRL 26.22 Decreased By ▼ -0.36 (-1.35%)
PTC 16.14 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-0.74%)
SEARL 85.70 Increased By ▲ 1.56 (1.85%)
TELE 7.67 Decreased By ▼ -0.29 (-3.64%)
TOMCL 36.47 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-0.36%)
TPLP 8.79 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (1.5%)
TREET 16.84 Decreased By ▼ -0.82 (-4.64%)
TRG 62.74 Increased By ▲ 4.12 (7.03%)
UNITY 28.20 Increased By ▲ 1.34 (4.99%)
WTL 1.34 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-2.9%)
BR100 10,086 Increased By 85.5 (0.85%)
BR30 31,170 Increased By 168.1 (0.54%)
KSE100 94,764 Increased By 571.8 (0.61%)
KSE30 29,410 Increased By 209 (0.72%)

Six EU governments face pressure to scrap national bans on certain gene-spliced foods that had been approved for growing and processing before the bloc began its 1998-2004 biotech ban, officials said on Tuesday.
Next month EU environment experts will discuss bans on five different genetically modified (GMO) foods - two types of rapeseed and three maize - imposed between 1997 and 2001.
Austria, Britain, France, Germany, Greece and Luxembourg used a get-out clause in one of the EU's various laws that regulates the environmental risk of GMO crops.
That allows an EU government to restrict, provisionally, the use or sale of a specific GMO product on its territory if there are grounds for concern over a possible risk to human health or the environment. The country must also justify its concern.
In every case, EU scientists said the bans were unjustified and the European Commission - the EU's executive arm - told the country concerned to lift it. But this never happened.
Now, diplomats say, the Commission wants to sort out what it sees as an anomaly from the period of the EU's biotech ban - a de facto moratorium that effectively blocked any new GMO approvals but ended in May.
Part of the rush to lift the bans, they say, is due to a case filed against the EU by the United States, Canada and Argentina at the World Trade Organisation. The three GMO producers say the EU's moratorium flouted world trade norms.
"Now that the (new) legislation is in force, in theory everything should be working fine. But the Commission can see that the safeguard clauses are not necessarily the easiest way to defend the WTO case," one EU diplomat said. "My impression is that they (the Commission) are keen to get them off the agenda or take decisions on them," he said.
PATCHY COOPERATION: Last year the Commission asked the six governments for information to support their requests for the bans to continue.
Only Greece and Austria sent in new evidence, which was rejected by the European Food Safety Authority as insufficient to justify banning GMO products already approved for EU use.
EU insiders say France has promised to submit data but is unlikely to do so. Germany and Luxembourg have yet to respond.
Britain may not play a large role in next month's debate since German chemicals group Bayer has anyway shelved plans to sell its T25 forage maize in Britain. The maize was the subject of a partial UK restriction imposed in 2001.
"Member states don't like being threatened with legal action from the Commission. But with the WTO case, they (the Commission) want to be seen to be doing something," said GMO campaigner Adrian Bebb at environment group Friends of the Earth Europe.
The experts are scheduled to meet on November 29 and will also discuss whether to authorise imports of a gene maize known as MON 863 and marketed by US biotech giant Monsanto.

Copyright Reuters, 2004

Comments

Comments are closed.