AIRLINK 196.51 Increased By ▲ 4.67 (2.43%)
BOP 10.07 Increased By ▲ 0.20 (2.03%)
CNERGY 7.81 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (1.83%)
FCCL 38.46 Increased By ▲ 0.60 (1.58%)
FFL 15.72 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.25%)
FLYNG 24.54 Decreased By ▼ -0.77 (-3.04%)
HUBC 130.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.05%)
HUMNL 13.70 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (0.81%)
KEL 4.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-1.5%)
KOSM 6.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.16%)
MLCF 45.05 Increased By ▲ 0.76 (1.72%)
OGDC 206.65 Decreased By ▼ -0.22 (-0.11%)
PACE 6.60 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.61%)
PAEL 39.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.85 (-2.1%)
PIAHCLA 17.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.44 (-2.5%)
PIBTL 7.98 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-1.12%)
POWER 9.12 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-1.3%)
PPL 179.40 Increased By ▲ 0.84 (0.47%)
PRL 38.51 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-1.46%)
PTC 24.20 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.25%)
SEARL 109.15 Increased By ▲ 1.30 (1.21%)
SILK 1.01 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (4.12%)
SSGC 37.78 Decreased By ▼ -1.33 (-3.4%)
SYM 18.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.32 (-1.67%)
TELE 8.51 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-1.05%)
TPLP 12.12 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-2.02%)
TRG 64.69 Decreased By ▼ -1.32 (-2%)
WAVESAPP 12.01 Decreased By ▼ -0.77 (-6.03%)
WTL 1.64 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-3.53%)
YOUW 3.87 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-2.03%)
BR100 12,000 Increased By 69.2 (0.58%)
BR30 35,548 Decreased By -112 (-0.31%)
KSE100 114,256 Increased By 1049.3 (0.93%)
KSE30 35,870 Increased By 304.3 (0.86%)

The Large Taxpayer Unit (LTU) has refunded rupees three million to the Sui Southern Gas Company (SSGC) and declared that there was no liability against the company since 1998.
According to details, following instructions from the Central Board of Revenue (CBR) on December 14, 1998, the then Sales Tax Collector, West Karachi, had deputed an audit team to conduct audit of all purchases made by the company from July 1993 to November 1998.
On the directive of the Sales Tax Collector, the SSGC made an ad hoc payment of the sales tax, amounting to rupees three million in December 1998.
The amount was subject to adjustment against sales tax payable by the company after scrutiny of the record by the Sales Tax department.
The company, therefore, requested that the same amount might either be adjusted against their sales tax liability or be refunded, as the amount was lying unadjusted in the company's books.
After completion of the audit in 1998, no liability was communicated to the SSGC by the department. Consequently, the company requested the Sales Tax department to refund or adjust the amount.
The LTU, which deals with the Sales Tax cases of large companies, took up the case and accordingly retrieved files from the Sales Tax House, which revealed that apparently no action had been taken regarding the case after November 2001.
Hence, neither the sales tax liability of the SSGC had been finally determined nor the amount in question was refunded to them.
After reopening the case, communications were made with the SSGC, Sales Tax House and Lahore Collectorate to finalise the investigations.
However, thorough investigations, the LTU reached the conclusion that in the absence of any adjudicated liability, the recovery of rupees three million was not justified and the same should be refunded to the SSGC.
The case is one of the rare examples in which large amount unduly recovered from the taxpayers had been refunded after a judicious investigation of the case.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2004

Comments

Comments are closed.