AGL 37.01 Decreased By ▼ -0.99 (-2.61%)
AIRLINK 215.30 Increased By ▲ 1.39 (0.65%)
BOP 9.48 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.64%)
CNERGY 6.28 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.16%)
DCL 8.80 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.34%)
DFML 43.68 Increased By ▲ 1.47 (3.48%)
DGKC 93.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.72 (-0.76%)
FCCL 34.88 Decreased By ▼ -0.31 (-0.88%)
FFBL 88.94 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
FFL 16.94 Increased By ▲ 0.55 (3.36%)
HUBC 126.89 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.01%)
HUMNL 13.45 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.6%)
KEL 5.28 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.56%)
KOSM 6.99 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.72%)
MLCF 42.95 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.07%)
NBP 58.90 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.08%)
OGDC 217.50 Decreased By ▼ -1.92 (-0.88%)
PAEL 39.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.03%)
PIBTL 8.14 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.49%)
PPL 190.71 Decreased By ▼ -0.95 (-0.5%)
PRL 38.34 Increased By ▲ 0.42 (1.11%)
PTC 26.41 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.27%)
SEARL 103.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.80 (-0.77%)
TELE 8.40 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.12%)
TOMCL 34.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-0.72%)
TPLP 12.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.62%)
TREET 25.80 Increased By ▲ 0.46 (1.82%)
TRG 73.00 Increased By ▲ 2.55 (3.62%)
UNITY 33.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.29 (-0.87%)
WTL 1.74 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (1.16%)
BR100 11,912 Increased By 18.2 (0.15%)
BR30 36,828 Decreased By -27.2 (-0.07%)
KSE100 110,609 Increased By 186.1 (0.17%)
KSE30 34,775 Decreased By -2.7 (-0.01%)

This is with reference to Syed A. Mateen's letter in your esteemed issue of 8 December. What is stated is that in relation to the irregular allotments of residential plots in various KDA schemes during 2-8-1990 to 6-11-1996, a list of 685 plots was drawn by the city government and displayed on its website.
It is now understood that the city government may come-up with another such list of plots irregularly allotted prior to 02-08-1990. Where is the exercise going to end? Is going back upto 15 years not enough?
In relation to most of the plots' allotted prior to 2-8-1990 the lease deeds must have been executed. Many plots may have been mortgaged with KDA's approval given for the purpose.
Execution of a lease deed and the issue of no objection for mortgage establishes that the contract with KDA is firm and that no question regarding price etc remains to be resolved.
The city's government touching the aforesaid plots' pricing issue will lead to a series of legal battles also because a good number of the plots must have changed many hands. The legal tangles may go on for 20-30 years. Chances of the city government winning these battles on law points are remote.
The only beneficiaries of the city government's purported action in relation to the plots allotted before 02-08-1990 would be the legal counsels on the roll of the city government and on the other side.
An eminent tax lawyer himself, the City Nazim must visualise the city government's legal position. He should try to do away with the possible long legal battles each of which will end-up with a decision at the level of the Supreme Court.
Needless to suggest that the battles will be arduous calling for the city government's approaching the Law Ministry at Islamabad for the issue of notifications at various stages, in so many cases.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2004

Comments

Comments are closed.