AIRLINK 191.00 Decreased By ▼ -5.65 (-2.87%)
BOP 10.15 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.1%)
CNERGY 6.75 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.9%)
FCCL 34.35 Increased By ▲ 1.33 (4.03%)
FFL 17.42 Increased By ▲ 0.77 (4.62%)
FLYNG 23.80 Increased By ▲ 1.35 (6.01%)
HUBC 126.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.99 (-0.78%)
HUMNL 13.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.72%)
KEL 4.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.21%)
KOSM 6.55 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (2.83%)
MLCF 43.35 Increased By ▲ 1.13 (2.68%)
OGDC 226.45 Increased By ▲ 13.42 (6.3%)
PACE 7.35 Increased By ▲ 0.34 (4.85%)
PAEL 41.96 Increased By ▲ 1.09 (2.67%)
PIAHCLA 17.24 Increased By ▲ 0.42 (2.5%)
PIBTL 8.45 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (1.93%)
POWER 9.05 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (2.61%)
PPL 194.30 Increased By ▲ 10.73 (5.85%)
PRL 37.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.77 (-2.01%)
PTC 24.05 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.08%)
SEARL 94.97 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-0.15%)
SILK 1.00 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
SSGC 40.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.31 (-0.77%)
SYM 17.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.41 (-2.25%)
TELE 8.72 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.11%)
TPLP 12.46 Increased By ▲ 0.25 (2.05%)
TRG 62.74 Decreased By ▼ -1.62 (-2.52%)
WAVESAPP 10.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.86%)
WTL 1.73 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-3.35%)
YOUW 4.02 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.5%)
BR100 11,814 Increased By 90.4 (0.77%)
BR30 36,234 Increased By 874.6 (2.47%)
KSE100 113,247 Increased By 609 (0.54%)
KSE30 35,712 Increased By 253.6 (0.72%)

This refers to the clarification of Nadra HQ, Media wing, Islamabad letter published in the Business Recorder of 10th July, 2005. Apart from the D.O.B. column, there are several other errors being committed by Nadra in issuance of NIC, even from correct manual as well as computerised informatory data of citizens, submitted and available in offices of Nadra.
The mistakes/errors on part of Nadra, 'Not done' by applicants, are causing mental, physical and financial losses to applicant without corrective measures so far.
In my new NIC, the name of my husband was incorrectly shown as my 'Father's name', despite writing it correctly in my application form. When I approached the Nadra office in Karachi for correction the 'Error' done by Nadra (Not by applicant), I was charged the prescribed 'Fee' for correction and issuance of new NIC with the correct information.
The Nadra office in Awami Markaz, Karachi, despite ascertaining their own (Nadra) mistake, refused to condone the prescribed fee and denied its refund while issuing the corrected NIC, which in principle regardless of amount, Nadra must bear.
I saw few other applicants with identical errors roaming around Nadra office, suffering the unwarranted torture of mind, time, and money for a mistake not done by them.
Will the Nadra Headquarter clarify and justify their action of penalising the applicants and causing inconveniences for some mistake or error done by Nadra itself.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2005

Comments

Comments are closed.