AIRLINK 188.50 Decreased By ▼ -8.15 (-4.14%)
BOP 10.17 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.3%)
CNERGY 6.61 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-1.2%)
FCCL 34.03 Increased By ▲ 1.01 (3.06%)
FFL 16.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.3%)
FLYNG 24.16 Increased By ▲ 1.71 (7.62%)
HUBC 126.20 Decreased By ▼ -1.09 (-0.86%)
HUMNL 13.82 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.58%)
KEL 4.82 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (1.26%)
KOSM 6.50 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (2.04%)
MLCF 43.19 Increased By ▲ 0.97 (2.3%)
OGDC 213.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.01%)
PACE 7.30 Increased By ▲ 0.29 (4.14%)
PAEL 42.19 Increased By ▲ 1.32 (3.23%)
PIAHCLA 17.47 Increased By ▲ 0.65 (3.86%)
PIBTL 8.43 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (1.69%)
POWER 9.00 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (2.04%)
PPL 184.90 Increased By ▲ 1.33 (0.72%)
PRL 38.02 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-0.65%)
PTC 24.25 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (0.75%)
SEARL 94.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.36 (-0.38%)
SILK 1.00 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
SSGC 39.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.71 (-1.76%)
SYM 17.89 Decreased By ▼ -0.32 (-1.76%)
TELE 8.73 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
TPLP 12.50 Increased By ▲ 0.29 (2.38%)
TRG 63.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.46 (-0.71%)
WAVESAPP 10.50 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.57%)
WTL 1.79 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
YOUW 3.98 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.5%)
BR100 11,721 Decreased By -1.9 (-0.02%)
BR30 35,442 Increased By 83 (0.23%)
KSE100 113,073 Increased By 434.6 (0.39%)
KSE30 35,576 Increased By 117.9 (0.33%)

This refers to the clarification of Nadra HQ, Media wing, Islamabad letter published in the Business Recorder of 10th July, 2005. Apart from the D.O.B. column, there are several other errors being committed by Nadra in issuance of NIC, even from correct manual as well as computerised informatory data of citizens, submitted and available in offices of Nadra.
The mistakes/errors on part of Nadra, 'Not done' by applicants, are causing mental, physical and financial losses to applicant without corrective measures so far.
In my new NIC, the name of my husband was incorrectly shown as my 'Father's name', despite writing it correctly in my application form. When I approached the Nadra office in Karachi for correction the 'Error' done by Nadra (Not by applicant), I was charged the prescribed 'Fee' for correction and issuance of new NIC with the correct information.
The Nadra office in Awami Markaz, Karachi, despite ascertaining their own (Nadra) mistake, refused to condone the prescribed fee and denied its refund while issuing the corrected NIC, which in principle regardless of amount, Nadra must bear.
I saw few other applicants with identical errors roaming around Nadra office, suffering the unwarranted torture of mind, time, and money for a mistake not done by them.
Will the Nadra Headquarter clarify and justify their action of penalising the applicants and causing inconveniences for some mistake or error done by Nadra itself.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2005

Comments

Comments are closed.