AGL 39.58 Decreased By ▼ -0.42 (-1.05%)
AIRLINK 131.22 Increased By ▲ 2.16 (1.67%)
BOP 6.81 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.89%)
CNERGY 4.71 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (4.9%)
DCL 8.44 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-1.29%)
DFML 41.47 Increased By ▲ 0.65 (1.59%)
DGKC 82.09 Increased By ▲ 1.13 (1.4%)
FCCL 33.10 Increased By ▲ 0.33 (1.01%)
FFBL 72.87 Decreased By ▼ -1.56 (-2.1%)
FFL 12.26 Increased By ▲ 0.52 (4.43%)
HUBC 110.74 Increased By ▲ 1.16 (1.06%)
HUMNL 14.51 Increased By ▲ 0.76 (5.53%)
KEL 5.19 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-2.26%)
KOSM 7.61 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-1.42%)
MLCF 38.90 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (0.78%)
NBP 64.01 Increased By ▲ 0.50 (0.79%)
OGDC 192.82 Decreased By ▼ -1.87 (-0.96%)
PAEL 25.68 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.12%)
PIBTL 7.34 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.68%)
PPL 154.07 Decreased By ▼ -1.38 (-0.89%)
PRL 25.83 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.16%)
PTC 17.81 Increased By ▲ 0.31 (1.77%)
SEARL 82.30 Increased By ▲ 3.65 (4.64%)
TELE 7.76 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-1.27%)
TOMCL 33.46 Decreased By ▼ -0.27 (-0.8%)
TPLP 8.49 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (1.07%)
TREET 16.62 Increased By ▲ 0.35 (2.15%)
TRG 57.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.82 (-1.41%)
UNITY 27.51 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.07%)
WTL 1.37 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-1.44%)
BR100 10,504 Increased By 59.3 (0.57%)
BR30 31,226 Increased By 36.9 (0.12%)
KSE100 98,080 Increased By 281.6 (0.29%)
KSE30 30,559 Increased By 78 (0.26%)

Builders and barmaids working outdoors will not have to be shielded from sunshine by their employers under European Union rules after a revolt by lawmakers on Wednesday. The European Parliament voted to leave it to individual EU states to regulate whether bosses should have to protect staff from the sun's harmful radiation, in a victory for pro-business conservative, liberal and nationalist deputies.
"It's a great victory for deregulation and less bureaucracy," German conservative Anja Weisgerber told Reuters. The proposal sparked a frenzy in the British and German tabloid press with warnings that buxom Bavarian beer garden barmaids in low-cut tops and bricklayers with naked torsos would have to cover up, although that was not what the draft law said.
Socialists and Greens argued EU legislation was vital to cut skin cancer rates among outdoor workers, but the right denounced it as an example of the nanny state running amok and over-burdening business.
British Socialist Stephen Hughes said an opportunity to give workers more information had been lost.
"No employer out there should think that this means they needn't take account of solar radiation," he told Reuters, adding that existing EU law laid down the principle of employer responsibility for over-exposure to sunlight.
Parliament rejected binding Europe-wide rules by 397 to 260 with nine abstentions - more than the absolute majority needed to amend legislation proposed by the executive European Commission and backed by the Council of EU member states.
Parliament, governments and the Commission must now meet in a conciliation committee to agree on the final wording.
In its original form, the Optical Radiation Directive would have forced employers to monitor workers' exposure to the sun, assess the risks and provide them with information.
The EU executive, which drafted the legislation to protect workers from exposure to artificial and natural radiation, said it would seek to balance worker rights with reaching a deal. Artificial radiation comes from devices such as lasers and ultra-violet lamps. All radiation can damage the skin and eyes. Business welcomed the vote.
"Today's vote is a victory for common sense," Hans-Werner Mueller, secretary-general of small and medium business lobby group UEAPME, said in a statement.
"The original proposals would ... create an unrealistic responsibility on employers with regard to sunlight exposure, setting a dangerous precedent in terms of future legal liability."
Irish conservative Avril Doyle said common sense had prevailed in the vote. "If ultimately I get skin cancer through irresponsible choices despite all the health warnings, should my employers be left to carry the can?" she asked in a statement.

Copyright Reuters, 2005

Comments

Comments are closed.