AGL 38.50 Decreased By ▼ -1.08 (-2.73%)
AIRLINK 128.00 Decreased By ▼ -3.22 (-2.45%)
BOP 7.02 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (3.08%)
CNERGY 4.51 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-4.25%)
DCL 8.19 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-2.96%)
DFML 38.70 Decreased By ▼ -2.77 (-6.68%)
DGKC 78.80 Decreased By ▼ -3.29 (-4.01%)
FCCL 31.75 Decreased By ▼ -1.35 (-4.08%)
FFBL 70.98 Decreased By ▼ -1.89 (-2.59%)
FFL 12.13 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-1.06%)
HUBC 107.50 Decreased By ▼ -3.24 (-2.93%)
HUMNL 13.76 Decreased By ▼ -0.75 (-5.17%)
KEL 4.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.29 (-5.59%)
KOSM 7.23 Decreased By ▼ -0.38 (-4.99%)
MLCF 37.50 Decreased By ▼ -1.40 (-3.6%)
NBP 68.08 Increased By ▲ 4.07 (6.36%)
OGDC 185.75 Decreased By ▼ -7.07 (-3.67%)
PAEL 24.87 Decreased By ▼ -0.81 (-3.15%)
PIBTL 7.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-1.23%)
PPL 146.99 Decreased By ▼ -7.08 (-4.6%)
PRL 24.70 Decreased By ▼ -1.13 (-4.37%)
PTC 16.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.91 (-5.11%)
SEARL 79.40 Decreased By ▼ -2.90 (-3.52%)
TELE 7.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.36 (-4.64%)
TOMCL 32.46 Decreased By ▼ -1.00 (-2.99%)
TPLP 8.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.34 (-4%)
TREET 16.59 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.18%)
TRG 56.20 Decreased By ▼ -1.20 (-2.09%)
UNITY 27.89 Increased By ▲ 0.38 (1.38%)
WTL 1.31 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-4.38%)
BR100 10,306 Decreased By -198.3 (-1.89%)
BR30 30,300 Decreased By -926.1 (-2.97%)
KSE100 96,583 Decreased By -1497.1 (-1.53%)
KSE30 30,052 Decreased By -506.8 (-1.66%)

The jail authorities did not produce Zubair Qayyum and others before the Special Court for Suppression of Terrorist Activities, as the Punjab home secretary extended their detention for further three months.
The detainees had applied for their bail, but the respondent, the jail authorities, refused to produce them before the court, as the Punjab home secretary has extended their detention period further.
It may be mentioned that the detainees were got recovered by Justice Syed Shabbar Raza Rizvi of the Lahore High Court in a petition filed for their recovery.
The LHC had disposed of the petition filed for their recovery, as the law officer on their production before the court informed that they were detained by the Punjab home secretary under the Maintenance of Public Order (MPO) Ordinance.
The court, while disposing of the petition, had advised the detainees to approach the court of original jurisdiction for their bail.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2005

Comments

Comments are closed.