BML 4.93 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.41%)
BOP 14.34 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.14%)
CNERGY 7.05 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.14%)
CPHL 89.59 Increased By ▲ 1.40 (1.59%)
DCL 12.41 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.24%)
DGKC 185.40 Increased By ▲ 1.12 (0.61%)
FCCL 50.08 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.16%)
FFL 15.80 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (0.7%)
GCIL 29.00 Increased By ▲ 0.64 (2.26%)
HUBC 160.41 Increased By ▲ 1.56 (0.98%)
KEL 5.10 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.79%)
KOSM 6.32 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.32%)
LOTCHEM 21.99 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (0.83%)
MLCF 86.85 Increased By ▲ 0.90 (1.05%)
NBP 145.00 Decreased By ▼ -1.87 (-1.27%)
PAEL 42.90 Increased By ▲ 0.33 (0.78%)
PIAHCLA 20.25 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.25%)
PIBTL 10.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.29%)
POWER 14.61 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.27%)
PPL 180.39 Increased By ▲ 0.95 (0.53%)
PREMA 39.65 Increased By ▲ 0.69 (1.77%)
PRL 31.99 Increased By ▲ 0.33 (1.04%)
PTC 22.89 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.26%)
SNGP 117.68 Increased By ▲ 0.65 (0.56%)
SSGC 41.68 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.22%)
TELE 7.77 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (1.57%)
TPLP 9.82 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.51%)
TREET 22.60 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (0.71%)
TRG 57.15 Increased By ▲ 0.82 (1.46%)
WTL 1.41 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
BML 4.93 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.41%)
BOP 14.34 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.14%)
CNERGY 7.05 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.14%)
CPHL 89.59 Increased By ▲ 1.40 (1.59%)
DCL 12.41 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.24%)
DGKC 185.40 Increased By ▲ 1.12 (0.61%)
FCCL 50.08 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.16%)
FFL 15.80 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (0.7%)
GCIL 29.00 Increased By ▲ 0.64 (2.26%)
HUBC 160.41 Increased By ▲ 1.56 (0.98%)
KEL 5.10 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.79%)
KOSM 6.32 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.32%)
LOTCHEM 21.99 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (0.83%)
MLCF 86.85 Increased By ▲ 0.90 (1.05%)
NBP 145.00 Decreased By ▼ -1.87 (-1.27%)
PAEL 42.90 Increased By ▲ 0.33 (0.78%)
PIAHCLA 20.25 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.25%)
PIBTL 10.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.29%)
POWER 14.61 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.27%)
PPL 180.39 Increased By ▲ 0.95 (0.53%)
PREMA 39.65 Increased By ▲ 0.69 (1.77%)
PRL 31.99 Increased By ▲ 0.33 (1.04%)
PTC 22.89 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.26%)
SNGP 117.68 Increased By ▲ 0.65 (0.56%)
SSGC 41.68 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.22%)
TELE 7.77 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (1.57%)
TPLP 9.82 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.51%)
TREET 22.60 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (0.71%)
TRG 57.15 Increased By ▲ 0.82 (1.46%)
WTL 1.41 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
BR100 15,003 Increased By 41.1 (0.27%)
BR30 42,253 Increased By 174.3 (0.41%)
KSE100 147,028 Increased By 536.6 (0.37%)
KSE30 44,872 Increased By 39.7 (0.09%)

Voters in a Japanese city overwhelmingly rejected a plan on Sunday to bring more planes and troops to a nearby US Marine base, complicating talks on relocating US forces throughout Japan.
With all votes counted, more than 43,000 rejected the plan and just over 5,000 were in favour, an official in the south-west city of Iwakuni said.
The result of the referendum is not binding, but a "No" vote is a headache for both Tokyo and Washington.
The referendum, a rare Japanese exercise in direct democracy, took place as Tokyo and Washington sought to wrap up by the end of March a sweeping plan to reorganise the nearly 50,000 US troops in Japan.
The two sides were also discussing how much Japan should pay to move 7,000 Marines from its southern island of Okinawa to Guam.
Opposition from Iwakuni and other communities worried about noise, accidents and crime associated with US bases has hampered efforts to finalise the overall realignment plan, part of Washington's efforts to transform the US military globally into a more flexible force.
An official in Iwakuni, 600 miles (1,000 km) west of Tokyo, reported earlier that almost 59 percent of the city's nearly 85,000 eligible voters had cast their ballots in the election.
A turnout of at least 50 percent was needed for the referendum to be valid.
Central government officials suggested the overall plan would be implemented whatever the outcome of the referendum.
"It is necessary to carry out the relocation at any cost," Defence Minister Fukushiro Nukaga was quoted by Kyodo news agency as saying in a statement. "I will do my utmost to gain local understanding by explaining the relocation plan."
Voters were asked to vote on a plan to transfer 57 carrier-based planes and about 1,600 military personnel from Atsugi naval base near Tokyo - where locals have complained of flight noise - to the Iwakuni Marine Corps Air Station, already home to more than 3,000 Marines and 57 US aircraft.
VOICE OF THE PEOPLE:
The transfer would take place in 2009 after completion of an offshore runway built on reclaimed land. In return, 17 Japanese planes and 700 Japanese military personnel would move to Atsugi.
Iwakuni Mayor Katsusuke Ihara, who called the referendum, said residents had the right to be heard.
"This is the voice of the people," Ihara told a private Japanese TV broadcaster.
"I have no right to comment on national issues such as security, but it is only natural for the people of Iwakuni to speak out on aspects that affect their lives," he said.
The Iwakuni referendum could bolster opposition in other places. Governor Keiichi Inamine of Okinawa, where resentment of the US bases is especially deep for complex historical reasons, on Sunday reiterated his opposition to a plan to relocate a Marine heliport inside the prefecture.
Ihara's critics had said he was using the referendum to improve his prospects in a mayoral election in April after Iwakuni merges with seven nearby towns and villages.
They had even urged voters to boycott the referendum to keep turnout below 50 percent.
Located 350 miles from the tense border between North and South Korea, US Marine Corps Air Station Iwakuni would play an important role in any conflict involving the peninsula.
Residents, however, were more concerned about the effect on their daily lives.
Some worry about noise pollution and crime. Others hope the government will offer financial incentives and help boost the local economy if the plan goes ahead.

Copyright Reuters, 2006

Comments

Comments are closed.