AIRLINK 212.82 Increased By ▲ 3.27 (1.56%)
BOP 10.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-2.01%)
CNERGY 7.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.35 (-4.76%)
FCCL 33.47 Decreased By ▼ -0.92 (-2.68%)
FFL 17.64 Decreased By ▼ -0.41 (-2.27%)
FLYNG 21.82 Decreased By ▼ -1.10 (-4.8%)
HUBC 129.11 Decreased By ▼ -3.38 (-2.55%)
HUMNL 13.86 Decreased By ▼ -0.28 (-1.98%)
KEL 4.86 Decreased By ▼ -0.17 (-3.38%)
KOSM 6.93 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-1.98%)
MLCF 43.63 Decreased By ▼ -1.57 (-3.47%)
OGDC 212.95 Decreased By ▼ -5.43 (-2.49%)
PACE 7.22 Decreased By ▼ -0.36 (-4.75%)
PAEL 41.17 Decreased By ▼ -0.53 (-1.27%)
PIAHCLA 16.83 Decreased By ▼ -0.47 (-2.72%)
PIBTL 8.63 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.94%)
POWERPS 12.50 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
PPL 183.03 Decreased By ▼ -6.00 (-3.17%)
PRL 39.63 Decreased By ▼ -2.70 (-6.38%)
PTC 24.73 Decreased By ▼ -0.44 (-1.75%)
SEARL 98.01 Decreased By ▼ -5.95 (-5.72%)
SILK 1.01 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-1.94%)
SSGC 41.73 Increased By ▲ 2.49 (6.35%)
SYM 18.86 Decreased By ▼ -0.30 (-1.57%)
TELE 9.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.24 (-2.6%)
TPLP 12.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.70 (-5.34%)
TRG 65.68 Decreased By ▼ -3.50 (-5.06%)
WAVESAPP 10.98 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (2.43%)
WTL 1.79 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (4.68%)
YOUW 4.03 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-2.66%)
BR100 11,866 Decreased By -213.1 (-1.76%)
BR30 35,697 Decreased By -905.3 (-2.47%)
KSE100 114,148 Decreased By -1904.2 (-1.64%)
KSE30 35,952 Decreased By -625.5 (-1.71%)

The government has decided not to include any sugar mill, with crushing capacity less than 7000 tons, in the 'power co-generation plan'.
"Sugar mills proposing co-generation power project should be self-sufficient in bagasse during the winter months with plants having in-house availability of required quantity of input," the guidelines and selection criteria of sugar mills for power co-generation say, a copy of which was made available 'exclusively' to Business Recorder.
The document suggests that cases of sugar mills meeting the laid down criteria would be processed on first-come-first-served basis, but their net/saleable output should be above 50 MW (excluding self-consumption of electricity.
The proposals submitted by the sponsor must contain details including Statement of Qualification (SoQ) as stipulated in the Power Policy 2002, as amended from time to time, the document says.
Sources said that it had also been decided that sugar mills located close to the gas pipeline/grid station would be given preference.
The financial and operational performance of the sugar mills should be in line with the SoQs to be submitted to the Private Power Infrastructure Board (PPIB), sources added.
Any sponsor wishing to undertake an unsolicited raw site co-generation power project of above 50 MW must register with the PPIB on payment of $10000 fee and purchase the pre-qualification documents against payment of $1,000.00.
The approved project would be issued Letter of Interest (LoI) after submission of the prescribed bank guarantee as per Power Policy 2002 and fulfilling the requirements to conduct feasibility study within four months.
After completion and approval of the feasibility study, the sponsor would be required to negotiate tariff with National Electric Power Regulatory Authority (Nepra), in co-ordination with the power purchaser, within two months.
The PPIB would issue Letter of Support (LoS) to the successful sponsor after fulfilment of the Power Policy requirements, to achieve financial closing within three months and start construction.
The sponsors would be given 12-18 months to complete the project after issuance of LoS.
Primarily, the cost of laying transmission line would be borne by the respective sugar mills. However, the cost would be reimbursed to the mills by National Transmission and Dispatch Company (NTDC) in due course of time under a separate and independent agreement which would not constitute part of the security package.
The power purchaser would not share it from any means. Gas allocation to the approved mills would be made available in accordance with 'Natural Gas Allocation and Management Policy 2005' to dual fired combined power cycle plants for the contract period with appropriate safeguards to protect interest of the gas supplier against non-availability or curtailment of gas supplies for events beyond reasonable control.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2006

Comments

Comments are closed.