AGL 39.58 Decreased By ▼ -0.42 (-1.05%)
AIRLINK 129.29 Decreased By ▼ -1.93 (-1.47%)
BOP 6.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.88%)
CNERGY 4.62 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-1.91%)
DCL 8.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.47%)
DFML 41.02 Decreased By ▼ -0.45 (-1.09%)
DGKC 81.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.59 (-0.72%)
FCCL 32.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.40 (-1.21%)
FFBL 71.99 Decreased By ▼ -0.88 (-1.21%)
FFL 12.44 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (1.47%)
HUBC 110.48 Decreased By ▼ -0.26 (-0.23%)
HUMNL 14.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-0.76%)
KEL 5.13 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-1.16%)
KOSM 7.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.13%)
MLCF 38.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-0.51%)
NBP 63.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.61 (-0.95%)
OGDC 189.50 Decreased By ▼ -3.32 (-1.72%)
PAEL 25.34 Decreased By ▼ -0.34 (-1.32%)
PIBTL 7.35 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.14%)
PPL 150.50 Decreased By ▼ -3.57 (-2.32%)
PRL 25.59 Decreased By ▼ -0.24 (-0.93%)
PTC 17.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.31 (-1.74%)
SEARL 80.95 Decreased By ▼ -1.35 (-1.64%)
TELE 7.64 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-1.55%)
TOMCL 32.94 Decreased By ▼ -0.52 (-1.55%)
TPLP 8.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-1.65%)
TREET 16.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.12%)
TRG 57.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-0.35%)
UNITY 27.85 Increased By ▲ 0.34 (1.24%)
WTL 1.36 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.73%)
BR100 10,423 Decreased By -81 (-0.77%)
BR30 30,804 Decreased By -422.4 (-1.35%)
KSE100 97,481 Decreased By -598.7 (-0.61%)
KSE30 30,355 Decreased By -203.9 (-0.67%)

Federal Tax Ombudsman former Justice Munir A Sheikh has advised the Central Board of Revenue (CBR) to maintain proper record of orders-in-original, show-cause notices and their proper service to the concerned parties so that no one could file bogus refund claims.
He gave this advice while deciding a complaint of a textile manufacturer, importer and exporter, who had filed four refund applications with the Sales Tax Department, Faisalabad.
The complainant had claimed that show-cause notices were neither issued nor served in any of the four cases. Similarly, the orders-in-original were also not received by him.
However, after three lengthy hearings and perusal of record of the Sales Tax Department, the FTO found that Sales Tax Department properly served the show-cause notices on the complainant and the finalisation of the orders-in-original on the available material was not unjustified.
He did not discern any mal-administration on the part of the department and rejected contentions of the complainant. The FTO, however, pointed out a number of discrepancies in the documents maintained by the sales tax department for proper service of show-cause notices and orders-in-original to the concerned parties.
He also indicated collusion between the office staff of the sales tax department and the parties who file illegal refund claims.
HE ADVISED THE CBR TO ISSUE INSTRUCTIONS TO ITS SUBORDINATE OFFICERS TO OBTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION WHENEVER A NOTICE IS REFUSED AND SENT BACK TO THE DEPARTMENT: (i)The date on which the service was attempted, (ii) The name of the person attempting the service, (iii) The name of the person, who refused the service, and (iv) The stamp of the courier service. The FTO called for the compliance report of these recommendations with 30 days.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2007

Comments

Comments are closed.