AGL 38.25 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (0.26%)
AIRLINK 129.49 Increased By ▲ 4.42 (3.53%)
BOP 7.21 Increased By ▲ 0.36 (5.26%)
CNERGY 4.59 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (3.15%)
DCL 8.20 Increased By ▲ 0.29 (3.67%)
DFML 38.73 Increased By ▲ 1.39 (3.72%)
DGKC 80.70 Increased By ▲ 2.93 (3.77%)
FCCL 32.10 Increased By ▲ 1.52 (4.97%)
FFBL 73.00 Increased By ▲ 4.14 (6.01%)
FFL 12.35 Increased By ▲ 0.49 (4.13%)
HUBC 108.99 Increased By ▲ 4.49 (4.3%)
HUMNL 14.00 Increased By ▲ 0.51 (3.78%)
KEL 4.95 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (6.45%)
KOSM 7.69 Increased By ▲ 0.52 (7.25%)
MLCF 37.50 Increased By ▲ 1.06 (2.91%)
NBP 70.60 Increased By ▲ 4.68 (7.1%)
OGDC 189.00 Increased By ▲ 9.47 (5.27%)
PAEL 25.10 Increased By ▲ 0.67 (2.74%)
PIBTL 7.39 Increased By ▲ 0.24 (3.36%)
PPL 150.90 Increased By ▲ 7.20 (5.01%)
PRL 25.15 Increased By ▲ 0.83 (3.41%)
PTC 17.24 Increased By ▲ 0.84 (5.12%)
SEARL 80.90 Increased By ▲ 2.33 (2.97%)
TELE 7.65 Increased By ▲ 0.43 (5.96%)
TOMCL 32.59 Increased By ▲ 0.62 (1.94%)
TPLP 8.48 Increased By ▲ 0.35 (4.31%)
TREET 16.55 Increased By ▲ 0.42 (2.6%)
TRG 56.80 Increased By ▲ 2.14 (3.92%)
UNITY 27.76 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (0.95%)
WTL 1.34 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (3.88%)
BR100 10,089 No Change 0 (0%)
BR30 29,509 No Change 0 (0%)
KSE100 98,249 Increased By 3675.1 (3.89%)
KSE30 30,622 Increased By 1176.9 (4%)

A Full Bench of Lahore High Court (LHC) on a petition, filed by a senior bar member, Hasan Nawaz, has stopped the government from taking any step to establish Federal High Court (FHC) for Islamabad Capital Territory till further orders, and adjourned hearing till January 9, 2008.
The petitioner contended that amendments made in Article 175, 192, 198 and 218 by Chief of the Army Staff were beyond the limits of the Provisional Constitutional Order. Therefore, these should be set aside. The court has also called S M Zafar, Waseem Sajjad, Dr Khalid Ranjha, Mojeeb-ur-Rehman and Ahmar Biala Soffi as amicus curiae of the court as the petitioner has raised some complicated questions relating to interpretation of several constitutional provisions.
The petitioner contended that the declared objectives of the PCO and Emergency did encompass the establishment of a FHC and fell beyond the capacity of Army Chief's power to hold the constitution in abeyance.
The amendments were made in the constitution by changing its basic structure where lay the judiciary. Thus the provisions intercepting basic changes in the constitution relating to the superior judiciary in Pakistan were illegal and mala fide.
The jurisdiction of the army chief, amounting against the judgement of the Supreme Court, rendered from time to time was illegal. Therefore, the court should affirm the independence of judiciary and reinforcement of grand norms of the constitution. He also requested the court to restrain the government from taking any further steps in establishing the federal high court.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2007

Comments

Comments are closed.