AGL 38.50 Increased By ▲ 0.35 (0.92%)
AIRLINK 128.01 Increased By ▲ 2.94 (2.35%)
BOP 7.12 Increased By ▲ 0.27 (3.94%)
CNERGY 4.55 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (2.25%)
DCL 8.17 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (3.29%)
DFML 38.38 Increased By ▲ 1.04 (2.79%)
DGKC 79.84 Increased By ▲ 2.07 (2.66%)
FCCL 32.05 Increased By ▲ 1.47 (4.81%)
FFBL 72.44 Increased By ▲ 3.58 (5.2%)
FFL 12.19 Increased By ▲ 0.33 (2.78%)
HUBC 109.11 Increased By ▲ 4.61 (4.41%)
HUMNL 13.75 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (1.93%)
KEL 4.87 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (4.73%)
KOSM 7.45 Increased By ▲ 0.28 (3.91%)
MLCF 37.49 Increased By ▲ 1.05 (2.88%)
NBP 70.08 Increased By ▲ 4.16 (6.31%)
OGDC 187.75 Increased By ▲ 8.22 (4.58%)
PAEL 25.04 Increased By ▲ 0.61 (2.5%)
PIBTL 7.25 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (1.4%)
PPL 150.50 Increased By ▲ 6.80 (4.73%)
PRL 24.85 Increased By ▲ 0.53 (2.18%)
PTC 17.09 Increased By ▲ 0.69 (4.21%)
SEARL 80.49 Increased By ▲ 1.92 (2.44%)
TELE 7.63 Increased By ▲ 0.41 (5.68%)
TOMCL 32.83 Increased By ▲ 0.86 (2.69%)
TPLP 8.48 Increased By ▲ 0.35 (4.31%)
TREET 16.58 Increased By ▲ 0.45 (2.79%)
TRG 56.20 Increased By ▲ 1.54 (2.82%)
UNITY 27.95 Increased By ▲ 0.45 (1.64%)
WTL 1.34 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (3.88%)
BR100 10,394 Increased By 304.4 (3.02%)
BR30 30,698 Increased By 1189.1 (4.03%)
KSE100 97,382 Increased By 2807.7 (2.97%)
KSE30 30,375 Increased By 930.6 (3.16%)

A Full Bench of Lahore High Court (LHC) on a petition, filed by a senior bar member, Hasan Nawaz, has stopped the government from taking any step to establish Federal High Court (FHC) for Islamabad Capital Territory till further orders, and adjourned hearing till January 9, 2008.
The petitioner contended that amendments made in Article 175, 192, 198 and 218 by Chief of the Army Staff were beyond the limits of the Provisional Constitutional Order. Therefore, these should be set aside. The court has also called S M Zafar, Waseem Sajjad, Dr Khalid Ranjha, Mojeeb-ur-Rehman and Ahmar Biala Soffi as amicus curiae of the court as the petitioner has raised some complicated questions relating to interpretation of several constitutional provisions.
The petitioner contended that the declared objectives of the PCO and Emergency did encompass the establishment of a FHC and fell beyond the capacity of Army Chief's power to hold the constitution in abeyance.
The amendments were made in the constitution by changing its basic structure where lay the judiciary. Thus the provisions intercepting basic changes in the constitution relating to the superior judiciary in Pakistan were illegal and mala fide.
The jurisdiction of the army chief, amounting against the judgement of the Supreme Court, rendered from time to time was illegal. Therefore, the court should affirm the independence of judiciary and reinforcement of grand norms of the constitution. He also requested the court to restrain the government from taking any further steps in establishing the federal high court.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2007

Comments

Comments are closed.