AGL 40.00 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
AIRLINK 127.20 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (0.13%)
BOP 6.62 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.75%)
CNERGY 4.56 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (1.11%)
DCL 8.56 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.12%)
DFML 41.66 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (0.53%)
DGKC 87.40 Increased By ▲ 0.55 (0.63%)
FCCL 32.50 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (0.68%)
FFBL 65.00 Increased By ▲ 0.20 (0.31%)
FFL 10.24 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.1%)
HUBC 109.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.42 (-0.38%)
HUMNL 14.65 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.2%)
KEL 5.12 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.39%)
KOSM 7.55 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (1.21%)
MLCF 41.65 Increased By ▲ 0.27 (0.65%)
NBP 59.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.66 (-1.09%)
OGDC 193.00 Increased By ▲ 2.90 (1.53%)
PAEL 28.16 Increased By ▲ 0.33 (1.19%)
PIBTL 7.82 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.13%)
PPL 151.30 Increased By ▲ 1.24 (0.83%)
PRL 27.08 Increased By ▲ 0.20 (0.74%)
PTC 16.08 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.06%)
SEARL 86.02 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.02%)
TELE 7.75 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.52%)
TOMCL 35.58 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (0.48%)
TPLP 8.18 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.74%)
TREET 16.39 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.12%)
TRG 53.30 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.02%)
UNITY 26.22 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.23%)
WTL 1.28 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (1.59%)
BR100 9,998 Increased By 114.2 (1.15%)
BR30 31,214 Increased By 613.5 (2%)
KSE100 94,202 Increased By 846.5 (0.91%)
KSE30 29,195 Increased By 264.5 (0.91%)

The provincial Ombudsman on Tuesday directed the Wasa officials to take action against three 'Recovery Field Inspectors', and stopped one annual increment of each of them besides recovery of 50 percent amount of the outstanding bill not recovered on account of negligence of duty.
The Ombudsman passed these directions on a complaint of Shaukat Mahmood who submitted that Wasa had sent him water bill of Rs 16,980 for July-August 2006 whereafter a bill of Rs 18,270 for November-December 2006 was sent. He said that neither the said bill was in his name nor did it concern him, but the Wasa functionaries were bent upon recovering the said bill amount from him and were coercing him and his family members in this regard.
The Ombudsman held that the complainant had purchased the property in question without obtaining clearance certificate from the Wasa and also did not inform the agency. Therefore, he faced the consequences.
The Ombudsman, however, directing Wasa functionaries to take action against responsible officials and observed that the functionaries who did not recover outstanding from the previous owner and allowed the amount to accumulate were equally responsible for neglect of their duty which amounted to maladministration by all standards.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2007

Comments

Comments are closed.