AGL 40.25 Increased By ▲ 0.25 (0.63%)
AIRLINK 127.34 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (0.24%)
BOP 6.61 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.9%)
CNERGY 4.51 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
DCL 8.62 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.82%)
DFML 41.91 Increased By ▲ 0.47 (1.13%)
DGKC 87.63 Increased By ▲ 0.78 (0.9%)
FCCL 32.77 Increased By ▲ 0.49 (1.52%)
FFBL 65.21 Increased By ▲ 0.41 (0.63%)
FFL 10.36 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (1.07%)
HUBC 109.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.06%)
HUMNL 14.80 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (0.82%)
KEL 5.12 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.39%)
KOSM 7.56 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (1.34%)
MLCF 41.84 Increased By ▲ 0.46 (1.11%)
NBP 59.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.71 (-1.18%)
OGDC 194.10 Increased By ▲ 4.00 (2.1%)
PAEL 28.25 Increased By ▲ 0.42 (1.51%)
PIBTL 7.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.38%)
PPL 152.25 Increased By ▲ 2.19 (1.46%)
PRL 26.62 Decreased By ▼ -0.26 (-0.97%)
PTC 16.12 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.31%)
SEARL 86.02 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.02%)
TELE 7.59 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-1.56%)
TOMCL 35.43 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.06%)
TPLP 8.12 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
TREET 16.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.41 (-2.5%)
TRG 52.83 Decreased By ▼ -0.46 (-0.86%)
UNITY 26.45 Increased By ▲ 0.29 (1.11%)
WTL 1.26 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
BR100 9,957 Increased By 73 (0.74%)
BR30 30,952 Increased By 352.3 (1.15%)
KSE100 93,937 Increased By 581.4 (0.62%)
KSE30 29,104 Increased By 173.1 (0.6%)

Provincial Ombudsman Abdur Rashid Khan has ordered Punjab University to issue a pass result card to an MA candidate named Asma Noreen following her alleged ineligibility.
Asma argued in her complaint that after she passed her MA English part-I in 2000, she appeared for the 2004 part II annual examination but her result card showed she had failed in papers II and IV though she was eligible to reappear in the 2007 annual exams. She sat for the 2006 exams but her result was declared as RL and instead of issuing the result card of annual 2006 the complainant was told she was ineligible for the 2006 exams.
The Ombudsman said that although as per rules a candidate appearing in MA part II examination was entitled to four chances in all yet the complainant while appearing in annual 2004 did not conceal anything and clearly said she had passed the MA part-I exams in 2000 but the university failed to establish her eligibility and she was shown eligible to reappear. The complainant remained under the bona fide impression that she was eligible to clear her compartment up to annual examination 2007.
The Ombudsman said the agency should accept its responsibility as informing the complainant at this stage that her chance for appearing in the failed papers was up to annual 2004 whereas she had already appeared in annual examination 2006 to clear the compartment was unjust, unfair and oppressive which tantamounts to mal-administration.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2008

Comments

Comments are closed.