AGL 40.00 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
AIRLINK 127.04 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
BOP 6.67 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
CNERGY 4.51 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
DCL 8.55 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
DFML 41.44 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
DGKC 86.85 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
FCCL 32.28 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
FFBL 64.80 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
FFL 10.25 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
HUBC 109.57 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
HUMNL 14.68 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
KEL 5.05 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
KOSM 7.46 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
MLCF 41.38 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
NBP 60.41 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
OGDC 190.10 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
PAEL 27.83 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
PIBTL 7.83 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
PPL 150.06 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
PRL 26.88 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
PTC 16.07 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
SEARL 86.00 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
TELE 7.71 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
TOMCL 35.41 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
TPLP 8.12 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
TREET 16.41 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
TRG 53.29 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
UNITY 26.16 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
WTL 1.26 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
BR100 10,010 Increased By 126.5 (1.28%)
BR30 31,023 Increased By 422.5 (1.38%)
KSE100 94,192 Increased By 836.5 (0.9%)
KSE30 29,201 Increased By 270.2 (0.93%)

The US ambassador to India has warned New Delhi it could be now or never for the controversial India-US nuclear technology deal, saying it was unlikely to be offered again.
US ambassador David Mulford's language was some of the toughest yet by a US representative about delays in India's clearance of the deal which would give New Delhi crucial access to civilian atomic technology.
In a television interview aired on Saturday, he called the agreement India's "passport to the world," adding its collapse would "affect the trust and discretion" in Indo-US relations. "If this agreement is not processed in the present (US) Congress it is unlikely that this deal will be offered again to India," Mulford told CNN-IBN.
Asked whether it was "now or maybe never" for the deal, Mulford replied, "That's pretty close to it." The deal - first agreed by US President George W. Bush and Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh in 2005 - is regarded by the governments of the two nations as a cornerstone of new, warmer Indo-US ties.
But Indian communists have threatened to withdraw backing for the minority Congress government if it goes ahead with the pact without their approval. They say the accord threatens India's nuclear weapons programme and could allow US intervention in its foreign policy. India's government rejects the claims and says the deal is needed to provide new fuel sources to keep energy-hungry India's economy growing strongly.
The pact still needs approval from the International Atomic Energy Agency to place India's civilian nuclear reactors under UN safeguards and the 45-nation Nuclear Suppliers Grodia's court to move it along.
"It certainly would not be revived and offered by any administration, Democratic or Republican before the year 2010," Mulford said. "If it were to be revived it would have to go through the Committee process and I think non-proliferation groups would insist on changes."
Some US critics fear the deal would hurt efforts to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons. An Indian government spokesman had no comment on Saturday but Foreign Minister Pranab Mukherjee said last weekend opposing the deal was "similar to opposing computerisation and automation." India has begun talks with the IAEA on a safeguards accord but the UN body and New Delhi have yet to find common ground.

Copyright Agence France-Presse, 2008

Comments

Comments are closed.