AGL 38.00 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.03%)
AIRLINK 210.38 Decreased By ▼ -5.15 (-2.39%)
BOP 9.48 Decreased By ▼ -0.32 (-3.27%)
CNERGY 6.48 Decreased By ▼ -0.31 (-4.57%)
DCL 8.96 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-2.29%)
DFML 38.37 Decreased By ▼ -0.59 (-1.51%)
DGKC 96.92 Decreased By ▼ -3.33 (-3.32%)
FCCL 36.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.30 (-0.82%)
FFBL 88.94 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
FFL 14.95 Increased By ▲ 0.46 (3.17%)
HUBC 130.69 Decreased By ▼ -3.44 (-2.56%)
HUMNL 13.29 Decreased By ▼ -0.34 (-2.49%)
KEL 5.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-3.34%)
KOSM 6.93 Decreased By ▼ -0.39 (-5.33%)
MLCF 44.78 Decreased By ▼ -1.09 (-2.38%)
NBP 59.07 Decreased By ▼ -2.21 (-3.61%)
OGDC 230.13 Decreased By ▼ -2.46 (-1.06%)
PAEL 39.29 Decreased By ▼ -1.44 (-3.54%)
PIBTL 8.31 Decreased By ▼ -0.27 (-3.15%)
PPL 200.35 Decreased By ▼ -2.99 (-1.47%)
PRL 38.88 Decreased By ▼ -1.93 (-4.73%)
PTC 26.88 Decreased By ▼ -1.43 (-5.05%)
SEARL 103.63 Decreased By ▼ -4.88 (-4.5%)
TELE 8.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.29 (-3.32%)
TOMCL 35.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.58 (-1.62%)
TPLP 13.52 Decreased By ▼ -0.32 (-2.31%)
TREET 25.01 Increased By ▲ 0.63 (2.58%)
TRG 64.12 Increased By ▲ 2.97 (4.86%)
UNITY 34.52 Decreased By ▼ -0.32 (-0.92%)
WTL 1.78 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (3.49%)
BR100 12,096 Decreased By -150 (-1.22%)
BR30 37,715 Decreased By -670.4 (-1.75%)
KSE100 112,415 Decreased By -1509.6 (-1.33%)
KSE30 35,508 Decreased By -535.7 (-1.49%)

A division bench of the Lahore High Court has directed the Privatisation Commission to make arrangements and pay pension and emolument dues within one month to the petitioner Abdul Majeed a former calligrapher in Progressive Papers Limited (PPL).
The petitioner argued that he was being denied the pension and the due emoluments since December 1, 1996. He added the PPL had terminated his service in 1991, with a pension worth 40 per cent of his salary. He said the Federal Service Tribunal, accepting his appeal on July 28, 2004, had ordered clearance of his pension under the PPL Pension Rules 1985. The Supreme Court refused to entertain the PPL Chief Executive's plea for denying the petitioner his pension and emoluments.
Representing Majeed, Muhammad Usman Arif advocate said despite the Supreme Court orders, his client was still deprived of his pension. "It is virtually a contempt of the Supreme Court of Pakistan," he added.
The counsel for respondents said the high court could not order implementation of the judgement of the Supreme Court and the Federal Service Tribunal because the PPL, being a privatised entity, was no more available in the field. The bench observed the preamble of the Privatisation Commission Ordinance 2006 provided for expeditious mechanism to resolve all disputes relating to privatisation.
The bench said even if it was assumed that the PPL was not liable to pay the pension, the petitioner could not be denied the right of pension, which would be paid by the commission. The bench directed the commission to inform the Deputy Registrar (Judicial) after complying with the court orders in a month's time.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2008

Comments

Comments are closed.