AGL 39.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.50 (-1.25%)
AIRLINK 128.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.96 (-0.74%)
BOP 6.83 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (1.19%)
CNERGY 4.70 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (4.68%)
DCL 8.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.58%)
DFML 41.40 Increased By ▲ 0.58 (1.42%)
DGKC 82.80 Increased By ▲ 1.84 (2.27%)
FCCL 33.05 Increased By ▲ 0.28 (0.85%)
FFBL 73.94 Decreased By ▼ -0.49 (-0.66%)
FFL 11.93 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (1.62%)
HUBC 110.75 Increased By ▲ 1.17 (1.07%)
HUMNL 14.48 Increased By ▲ 0.73 (5.31%)
KEL 5.23 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-1.51%)
KOSM 7.59 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-1.68%)
MLCF 38.90 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (0.78%)
NBP 64.10 Increased By ▲ 0.59 (0.93%)
OGDC 194.08 Decreased By ▼ -0.61 (-0.31%)
PAEL 25.68 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.12%)
PIBTL 7.36 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.41%)
PPL 155.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-0.13%)
PRL 25.94 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (0.58%)
PTC 18.01 Increased By ▲ 0.51 (2.91%)
SEARL 82.26 Increased By ▲ 3.61 (4.59%)
TELE 7.73 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-1.65%)
TOMCL 33.48 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-0.74%)
TPLP 8.51 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (1.31%)
TREET 16.60 Increased By ▲ 0.33 (2.03%)
TRG 56.90 Decreased By ▼ -1.32 (-2.27%)
UNITY 27.55 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.22%)
WTL 1.38 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.72%)
BR100 10,539 Increased By 94.2 (0.9%)
BR30 31,327 Increased By 137.8 (0.44%)
KSE100 98,410 Increased By 611.4 (0.63%)
KSE30 30,705 Increased By 224.4 (0.74%)

The Lahore High Court (LHC) adjourned to October 07 the proceedings in some identical petitions challenging increased in electricity tariff as the law officer failed to appear before the court. The court, however, allowed the government to issue increased electricity tariff notification to the extent of petitioner but the same would not be implemented till the court asks to do so.
The court is hearing various petitions filed by Aptama and industrial units challenging the increase in tariff for consumers. The LHC had already restrained National Electric Power Regulatory Authority (Nepra) and electric distribution companies from implementing the increased tariff in respect of Lesco, Fesco, Jepco and Mepco. The petitioners through their counsel Mian Mahmood Rashid and others pleaded that Nepra determined the tariff on February 23, 2007 and made industrial consumers to pay substantially higher rate of electricity. But despite enduring sufferings, Aptma started making payment in the best national interest.
However, just after 13 days of passing of tariff, the electric distribution companies like Lahore Electricity Supply Company (Lesco), Faisalabad Electricity Supply Company (Fesco), Gujranwala Electricity Power Company (Gepco) and Multan Electricity Power Company (Mepco) filed a review petition before Nepra.
The petitioners said the Nepra did not have the review powers under the law but it proceeded with and accepted their review petitions without giving nay notice to petitioners or their parent association Aptama. The petitioners argued that with acceptance of review petitions on January 10, 2008 the tariff was hugely enhanced to the greatest disadvantage clearing violating the principle "no one should be condemned unheard".
They pointed out that just one month after that increase, Nepra again made a decision on February 12, 2008 and further increased the electricity tariff while acting under self-regulated and automatic mechanism called biannual adjustment. Seven moths later the Nepra further enhanced the tariff on August 22, 2008. They argued that Nepra had violated the court's order by making final determination of electricity tariff because LHC had granted stay in a similar case against Lesco. They said their cases were at par with Lesco. They further argued that review order of January 10, 2008 was illegal.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2008

Comments

Comments are closed.