AGL 37.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.30 (-0.79%)
AIRLINK 128.40 Increased By ▲ 3.33 (2.66%)
BOP 7.27 Increased By ▲ 0.42 (6.13%)
CNERGY 4.58 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (2.92%)
DCL 8.45 Increased By ▲ 0.54 (6.83%)
DFML 38.85 Increased By ▲ 1.51 (4.04%)
DGKC 80.14 Increased By ▲ 2.37 (3.05%)
FCCL 32.00 Increased By ▲ 1.42 (4.64%)
FFBL 73.60 Increased By ▲ 4.74 (6.88%)
FFL 12.27 Increased By ▲ 0.41 (3.46%)
HUBC 109.03 Increased By ▲ 4.53 (4.33%)
HUMNL 14.03 Increased By ▲ 0.54 (4%)
KEL 4.98 Increased By ▲ 0.33 (7.1%)
KOSM 7.48 Increased By ▲ 0.31 (4.32%)
MLCF 37.98 Increased By ▲ 1.54 (4.23%)
NBP 70.15 Increased By ▲ 4.23 (6.42%)
OGDC 187.50 Increased By ▲ 7.97 (4.44%)
PAEL 25.10 Increased By ▲ 0.67 (2.74%)
PIBTL 7.38 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (3.22%)
PPL 151.10 Increased By ▲ 7.40 (5.15%)
PRL 25.11 Increased By ▲ 0.79 (3.25%)
PTC 17.05 Increased By ▲ 0.65 (3.96%)
SEARL 81.40 Increased By ▲ 2.83 (3.6%)
TELE 7.50 Increased By ▲ 0.28 (3.88%)
TOMCL 32.50 Increased By ▲ 0.53 (1.66%)
TPLP 8.45 Increased By ▲ 0.32 (3.94%)
TREET 16.45 Increased By ▲ 0.32 (1.98%)
TRG 56.45 Increased By ▲ 1.79 (3.27%)
UNITY 28.00 Increased By ▲ 0.50 (1.82%)
WTL 1.33 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (3.1%)
BR100 10,476 Increased By 386.7 (3.83%)
BR30 30,834 Increased By 1325.5 (4.49%)
KSE100 97,926 Increased By 3351.8 (3.54%)
KSE30 30,547 Increased By 1102.3 (3.74%)

The Lahore High Court (LHC) on Tuesday restrained District Nazim and Naib Nazim Sheikhupura, from performing their official duties till October 28 with directions to file their replies in a petition challenging their action of taking charge of the office at their own.
The petitioner former district Nazim Jalil Sharqpuri contended that no confidence motion was moved against him and the august court had made the result of no confidence motion subject to court's order.
However, respondents Nazim Rahmat Ali Dogar and Naib Nazim Mian Liaqat assumed the charge of the office despite the fact that no official notification was issued. The petitioner alleged that both office holders were releasing funds for the development projects without having any legal authority in this regard. As petitioners' counsel was arguing when counsel for respondents also made his appearance and sought time to file reply.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2008

Comments

Comments are closed.