AIRLINK 217.98 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
BOP 10.93 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
CNERGY 7.55 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
FCCL 34.83 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
FFL 19.32 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
FLYNG 25.15 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
HUBC 131.09 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
HUMNL 14.56 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
KEL 5.18 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
KOSM 7.36 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
MLCF 45.63 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
OGDC 222.08 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
PACE 8.16 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
PAEL 44.19 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
PIAHCLA 17.69 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
PIBTL 8.97 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
POWERPS 12.51 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
PPL 193.01 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
PRL 43.17 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
PTC 26.63 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
SEARL 107.08 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
SILK 1.04 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
SSGC 45.00 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
SYM 21.19 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
TELE 10.15 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
TPLP 14.51 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
TRG 67.28 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
WAVESAPP 11.29 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
WTL 1.70 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
YOUW 4.25 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
BR100 12,256 Decreased By -140.5 (-1.13%)
BR30 36,687 Decreased By -660.1 (-1.77%)
KSE100 116,788 Decreased By -798.6 (-0.68%)
KSE30 36,793 Decreased By -271.7 (-0.73%)

The Lahore High Court in a petition filed by Punjab Institute of Cardiology (PIC) seeking possession of land allegedly grabbed by the residents of Shadman on Monday issued notices to the Lahore Development Authority (LDA) and other respondents for a February 25 hearing.
PIC through its Medical Superintendent (MS) submitted that Punjab government had allotted a piece of land to PIC measuring 2 kanals and 3 marlas adjacent to the institute.
The petitioner applied to the LDA for the demarcation of the said land but the authority refused to do so. The Petitioner contended that some residents of Shadman Colony by misleading the court had obtained possession of the said land to establish residential scheme over it.
The private respondents including Dr Rasheed Randhawa and Muhammad Ali etc without making PIC party in their cases got the orders in their favours from high court. The MS stated that the government had granted the land to PIC for its expansion plan, which could be proved by the record of revenue department. Further, he prayed to the court to direct the LDA to carry out demarcation of the land in favour of the Institute and cancel the allotments fraudulently obtained by the respondents.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2009

Comments

Comments are closed.