AIRLINK 201.24 Decreased By ▼ -3.21 (-1.57%)
BOP 9.97 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-1.19%)
CNERGY 6.89 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.29%)
FCCL 35.36 Increased By ▲ 0.53 (1.52%)
FFL 17.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.35%)
FLYNG 24.21 Decreased By ▼ -0.31 (-1.26%)
HUBC 138.19 Increased By ▲ 0.79 (0.57%)
HUMNL 14.07 Increased By ▲ 0.25 (1.81%)
KEL 4.86 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-1.02%)
KOSM 6.66 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.6%)
MLCF 46.31 Increased By ▲ 2.00 (4.51%)
OGDC 222.54 Increased By ▲ 0.63 (0.28%)
PACE 7.06 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.42%)
PAEL 43.14 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (0.4%)
PIAHCLA 17.03 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.29%)
PIBTL 8.54 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.58%)
POWER 9.10 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.89%)
PPL 188.76 Decreased By ▼ -1.84 (-0.97%)
PRL 43.27 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (0.53%)
PTC 25.35 Increased By ▲ 0.31 (1.24%)
SEARL 110.42 Increased By ▲ 4.01 (3.77%)
SILK 1.03 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.98%)
SSGC 42.64 Decreased By ▼ -0.27 (-0.63%)
SYM 18.57 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (1.42%)
TELE 9.12 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.22%)
TPLP 13.68 Increased By ▲ 0.57 (4.35%)
TRG 68.16 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.04%)
WAVESAPP 10.27 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.29%)
WTL 1.87 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
YOUW 4.01 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-1.96%)
BR100 12,220 Increased By 82.9 (0.68%)
BR30 37,317 Increased By 171.8 (0.46%)
KSE100 115,845 Increased By 572.7 (0.5%)
KSE30 36,476 Increased By 164.8 (0.45%)

The Lahore High Court (LHC) while accepting the writ petition filed by All Pakistan Textile Mills Association (Aptma) set aside Nepra's electricity tariff determination and remanded the case to the National Electric Power Regulatory Authority (Nepra) for fresh revision of the tariff determination.
The various constitutional petitions had been filed through Barrister Syed Ali Zafar and Advocate Rashid Mehmood by All Pakistan Textile Mills Association (Aptma) and a large number of textile units located throughout Pakistan against various electricity distribution companies (Discos) such as Lesco, Pepco, Fesco, Mepco, Gepco and others. In these writ petitions Zafar had argued that the electricity tariffs determined by Nepra had been in violation of the Nepra Act, 1997 and Rules thereunder and had been determined without following the principles of natural justice and hearing and without dealing with objections of all stake-holders and consumers of the Discos.
He further submitted that Nepra is a judicial authority, which is subject to the writ jurisdiction of the High Court and in exercise of the powers of judicial review the High Court could set aside the orders passed by the Nepra if the same contravened the law. The counsel for the Discos and Nepra argued that the tariffs had never in the history of Pakistan been set aside and in this case the Nepra had followed the law in letter and spirit. The court after hearing all the parties at length had reserved its verdict, which was announced here on Friday.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2009

Comments

Comments are closed.