AGL 34.48 Decreased By ▼ -0.72 (-2.05%)
AIRLINK 132.50 Increased By ▲ 9.27 (7.52%)
BOP 5.16 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (2.38%)
CNERGY 3.83 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-2.05%)
DCL 8.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.61%)
DFML 45.30 Increased By ▲ 1.08 (2.44%)
DGKC 75.90 Increased By ▲ 1.55 (2.08%)
FCCL 24.85 Increased By ▲ 0.38 (1.55%)
FFBL 44.18 Decreased By ▼ -4.02 (-8.34%)
FFL 8.80 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.23%)
HUBC 144.00 Decreased By ▼ -1.85 (-1.27%)
HUMNL 10.52 Decreased By ▼ -0.33 (-3.04%)
KEL 4.00 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
KOSM 7.74 Decreased By ▼ -0.26 (-3.25%)
MLCF 33.25 Increased By ▲ 0.45 (1.37%)
NBP 56.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.65 (-1.14%)
OGDC 141.00 Decreased By ▼ -4.35 (-2.99%)
PAEL 25.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.19%)
PIBTL 5.74 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.35%)
PPL 112.74 Decreased By ▼ -4.06 (-3.48%)
PRL 24.08 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.33%)
PTC 11.19 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (1.27%)
SEARL 58.50 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (0.15%)
TELE 7.42 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.93%)
TOMCL 41.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.24%)
TPLP 8.23 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.96%)
TREET 15.14 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.39%)
TRG 56.10 Increased By ▲ 0.90 (1.63%)
UNITY 27.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-0.54%)
WTL 1.31 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-2.24%)
BR100 8,615 Increased By 43.5 (0.51%)
BR30 26,900 Decreased By -375.9 (-1.38%)
KSE100 82,074 Increased By 615.2 (0.76%)
KSE30 26,034 Increased By 234.5 (0.91%)

The Lahore High Court (LHC) while accepting the writ petition filed by All Pakistan Textile Mills Association (Aptma) set aside Nepra's electricity tariff determination and remanded the case to the National Electric Power Regulatory Authority (Nepra) for fresh revision of the tariff determination.
The various constitutional petitions had been filed through Barrister Syed Ali Zafar and Advocate Rashid Mehmood by All Pakistan Textile Mills Association (Aptma) and a large number of textile units located throughout Pakistan against various electricity distribution companies (Discos) such as Lesco, Pepco, Fesco, Mepco, Gepco and others. In these writ petitions Zafar had argued that the electricity tariffs determined by Nepra had been in violation of the Nepra Act, 1997 and Rules thereunder and had been determined without following the principles of natural justice and hearing and without dealing with objections of all stake-holders and consumers of the Discos.
He further submitted that Nepra is a judicial authority, which is subject to the writ jurisdiction of the High Court and in exercise of the powers of judicial review the High Court could set aside the orders passed by the Nepra if the same contravened the law. The counsel for the Discos and Nepra argued that the tariffs had never in the history of Pakistan been set aside and in this case the Nepra had followed the law in letter and spirit. The court after hearing all the parties at length had reserved its verdict, which was announced here on Friday.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2009

Comments

Comments are closed.