AGL 40.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.02%)
AIRLINK 127.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.99 (-0.77%)
BOP 6.68 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (1.21%)
CNERGY 4.49 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-2.39%)
DCL 8.60 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (1.42%)
DFML 41.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.18 (-0.43%)
DGKC 86.71 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (0.15%)
FCCL 32.16 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.06%)
FFBL 64.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.72 (-1.1%)
FFL 10.29 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.39%)
HUBC 109.51 Decreased By ▼ -0.98 (-0.89%)
HUMNL 14.90 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (1.02%)
KEL 5.05 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-1.56%)
KOSM 7.40 Increased By ▲ 0.28 (3.93%)
MLCF 41.39 Decreased By ▼ -0.26 (-0.62%)
NBP 60.60 Increased By ▲ 0.51 (0.85%)
OGDC 190.00 Decreased By ▼ -4.69 (-2.41%)
PAEL 27.81 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-0.5%)
PIBTL 7.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-3.13%)
PPL 149.75 Decreased By ▼ -1.42 (-0.94%)
PRL 26.73 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-0.56%)
PTC 16.18 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (1.13%)
SEARL 86.02 Increased By ▲ 7.82 (10%)
TELE 7.72 Increased By ▲ 0.33 (4.47%)
TOMCL 35.58 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.25%)
TPLP 8.14 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (2.91%)
TREET 16.51 Increased By ▲ 0.62 (3.9%)
TRG 53.35 Increased By ▲ 0.59 (1.12%)
UNITY 26.28 Decreased By ▼ -0.27 (-1.02%)
WTL 1.26 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.79%)
BR100 9,889 Decreased By -31.1 (-0.31%)
BR30 30,611 Decreased By -140.9 (-0.46%)
KSE100 93,355 Increased By 130.9 (0.14%)
KSE30 28,931 Increased By 46 (0.16%)

The Lahore High Court (LHC) while accepting the writ petition filed by All Pakistan Textile Mills Association (Aptma) set aside Nepra's electricity tariff determination and remanded the case to the National Electric Power Regulatory Authority (Nepra) for fresh revision of the tariff determination.
The various constitutional petitions had been filed through Barrister Syed Ali Zafar and Advocate Rashid Mehmood by All Pakistan Textile Mills Association (Aptma) and a large number of textile units located throughout Pakistan against various electricity distribution companies (Discos) such as Lesco, Pepco, Fesco, Mepco, Gepco and others. In these writ petitions Zafar had argued that the electricity tariffs determined by Nepra had been in violation of the Nepra Act, 1997 and Rules thereunder and had been determined without following the principles of natural justice and hearing and without dealing with objections of all stake-holders and consumers of the Discos.
He further submitted that Nepra is a judicial authority, which is subject to the writ jurisdiction of the High Court and in exercise of the powers of judicial review the High Court could set aside the orders passed by the Nepra if the same contravened the law. The counsel for the Discos and Nepra argued that the tariffs had never in the history of Pakistan been set aside and in this case the Nepra had followed the law in letter and spirit. The court after hearing all the parties at length had reserved its verdict, which was announced here on Friday.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2009

Comments

Comments are closed.