AIRLINK 204.55 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (0.05%)
BOP 9.99 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.99%)
CNERGY 6.98 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.01%)
FCCL 35.49 Increased By ▲ 0.66 (1.89%)
FFL 17.34 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (0.76%)
FLYNG 24.52 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
HUBC 139.41 Increased By ▲ 2.01 (1.46%)
HUMNL 14.05 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (1.66%)
KEL 4.89 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.41%)
KOSM 6.75 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.75%)
MLCF 46.03 Increased By ▲ 1.72 (3.88%)
OGDC 224.20 Increased By ▲ 2.29 (1.03%)
PACE 7.19 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (1.41%)
PAEL 43.89 Increased By ▲ 0.92 (2.14%)
PIAHCLA 17.16 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.47%)
PIBTL 8.72 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (1.51%)
POWER 9.10 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.89%)
PPL 191.00 Increased By ▲ 0.40 (0.21%)
PRL 43.65 Increased By ▲ 0.61 (1.42%)
PTC 25.60 Increased By ▲ 0.56 (2.24%)
SEARL 111.35 Increased By ▲ 4.94 (4.64%)
SILK 1.03 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.98%)
SSGC 42.98 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.16%)
SYM 18.79 Increased By ▲ 0.48 (2.62%)
TELE 9.22 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.88%)
TPLP 14.00 Increased By ▲ 0.89 (6.79%)
TRG 68.76 Increased By ▲ 0.63 (0.92%)
WAVESAPP 10.35 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (1.07%)
WTL 1.88 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.53%)
YOUW 4.08 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.24%)
BR100 12,285 Increased By 148.1 (1.22%)
BR30 37,658 Increased By 512.8 (1.38%)
KSE100 116,162 Increased By 889.8 (0.77%)
KSE30 36,588 Increased By 277.1 (0.76%)

A division bench of the Lahore High Court (LHC) has issued pre-admission notice for April 27 in a writ petition, challenging advancing of the clock by an hour (Daylight Time Saving- DTS) as well as unequal burden of load-shedding on the citizens.
Petitioner Imtiaz Rashid Qureshi, through his counsel Barrister Farooq Hassan, contended that alteration made in the time from April 15 last was without any statutory or constitutional authority, unreasonable, arbitrary, lacking in cohesion and against the fundamental rights of the people.
He said such exercise of power was void per se, as the Federation was utterly confused as to differentiate between advancing of the clocks and backing them up. The petitioner said the government claimed that advancing the clock by one hour aimed at doing equal good to the people was discriminatory and arbitrary in constitutional terms as well as undemocratic.
As to load shedding, the petitioner said, the authorities claimed that the difference of 2200mw in supply and demand of electricity existed per day load shedding across the board should not exceed three hours, which, however, was from 16 to 18 hours a day. He prayed to the court to strike down the notification relating to advancing the clock by one hour and also direct the authorities to put equal burden of load shedding on the citizens.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2009

Comments

Comments are closed.