AIRLINK 189.64 Decreased By ▼ -7.01 (-3.56%)
BOP 10.09 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.49%)
CNERGY 6.68 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.15%)
FCCL 34.14 Increased By ▲ 1.12 (3.39%)
FFL 17.09 Increased By ▲ 0.44 (2.64%)
FLYNG 23.83 Increased By ▲ 1.38 (6.15%)
HUBC 126.05 Decreased By ▼ -1.24 (-0.97%)
HUMNL 13.79 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-0.79%)
KEL 4.77 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.21%)
KOSM 6.58 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (3.3%)
MLCF 43.28 Increased By ▲ 1.06 (2.51%)
OGDC 224.96 Increased By ▲ 11.93 (5.6%)
PACE 7.38 Increased By ▲ 0.37 (5.28%)
PAEL 41.74 Increased By ▲ 0.87 (2.13%)
PIAHCLA 17.19 Increased By ▲ 0.37 (2.2%)
PIBTL 8.41 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (1.45%)
POWER 9.05 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (2.61%)
PPL 193.09 Increased By ▲ 9.52 (5.19%)
PRL 37.34 Decreased By ▼ -0.93 (-2.43%)
PTC 24.02 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.21%)
SEARL 94.54 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-0.6%)
SILK 0.99 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-1%)
SSGC 39.93 Decreased By ▼ -0.38 (-0.94%)
SYM 17.77 Decreased By ▼ -0.44 (-2.42%)
TELE 8.66 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.8%)
TPLP 12.39 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (1.47%)
TRG 62.65 Decreased By ▼ -1.71 (-2.66%)
WAVESAPP 10.28 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-1.53%)
WTL 1.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-2.23%)
YOUW 3.97 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.75%)
BR100 11,814 Increased By 90.4 (0.77%)
BR30 36,234 Increased By 874.6 (2.47%)
KSE100 113,247 Increased By 609 (0.54%)
KSE30 35,712 Increased By 253.6 (0.72%)

The Lahore High Court (LHC) here on Monday summoned a well-known female singer Naseebo Lal in person for June 30 in a petition challenging the alleged vulgar songs sung by her. On previous date of hearing the court, while imposing ban on exhibition and display of controversial songs Naseebo Lal and Nooro Lal and sought their replies.
On Monday, neither Naseebo Lal nor her counsel appeared before the court, the court therefore, taking notice of her delinquency summoned her and directed her to appear before the court in person. However, an advocate on behalf of Nooro Lal appeared before the court and sought time for filing written reply.
Meanwhile, Central Board of Film Censor (CBFC) through its secretary filed a reply in response to the petition filed by a local lawyer Asif Mehmood Khan. In its written reply, the CBFC said that it is governed by Motion Pictures Ordinance 1979 and its main functions are confined to censorship of cinematography films presented to it for certification and there is no provision in law which empowers it and other respondent departments to intervene or check the ethical work being prepared and played by the respondent singers.
CBFC said that its duty is only to check exhibition in licensed places like cinemas, however, it said that the trend of making vulgar songs is not denied but the same is not presented before the respondent departments. To effect of the respondent female singer, CBFC said they are professional singers and their private work does not come under the purview of CBFC.
The CBFC did not certify the impugned songs of the singers, the report added. Petitioner submitted that the departments concerned in connivance with some other criminal elements were violating the law and the constitution but also spoiling the integrity, sanctity and morality of the society.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2009

Comments

Comments are closed.