AGL 40.00 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
AIRLINK 127.04 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
BOP 6.67 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
CNERGY 4.51 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
DCL 8.55 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
DFML 41.44 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
DGKC 86.85 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
FCCL 32.28 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
FFBL 64.80 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
FFL 10.25 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
HUBC 109.57 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
HUMNL 14.68 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
KEL 5.05 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
KOSM 7.46 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
MLCF 41.38 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
NBP 60.41 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
OGDC 190.10 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
PAEL 27.83 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
PIBTL 7.83 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
PPL 150.06 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
PRL 26.88 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
PTC 16.07 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
SEARL 86.00 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
TELE 7.71 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
TOMCL 35.41 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
TPLP 8.12 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
TREET 16.41 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
TRG 53.29 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
UNITY 26.16 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
WTL 1.26 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
BR100 10,010 Increased By 126.5 (1.28%)
BR30 31,023 Increased By 422.5 (1.38%)
KSE100 94,192 Increased By 836.5 (0.9%)
KSE30 29,201 Increased By 270.2 (0.93%)

Talks of public-private partnership are in vogue in the government circles. And it should be. In the absence of both adequate funds and the capacity to focus on economic growth, it is in the country's interest to make an efficient use of the private sector.
The question, however, is that where should this synergy be channelled. One area where this may be best utilised is infrastructural development. There is already a dearth of funds for PSDP. And considering the dearth of funds available with the government, chances are that PSDP allocation will be squeezed further in the current fiscal year and will remain under pressure in subsequent years as well.
The trouble is that such cutbacks typically come in infrastructural component of the programme. Be it power, roads, ports, airports, water, railways, or even urban facilities, the country's infrastructure needs are enormous, requiring massive and urgent investment in the sector. Pakistan infrastructure in term of quality and quantity averaged at 3.6 compared to South Asian average of 4.2.
While some of the existing infrastructure in the country is world class, most of it is below average. Unless it can be significantly improved, infrastructure will continue to be a bottleneck to growth, a threat to competitiveness and an obstacle to poverty reduction.
With the government fiscally challenged to deal with these issues alone, much is left to the private sector Although, private sector investment in infrastructure projects has been growing gradually it is still dismal - averaging just 1.4 percent of GDP, compared with the need to invest around 7.5 percent of GDP per annum over the next decade, to sustain a growth of 7 to 8 percent, according to ADB estimates. In comparison private investment has accounted for more than 20 percent of total investment in infrastructure in developing countries over the last decade, according to other reports.
The only thing the government needs to do before going full speed with the public-private partnership is to strengthen the policy and regulatory framework, to avoid the deadly combination of favouritism, corruption and incompetence amongst other issues.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2009

Comments

Comments are closed.