AGL 39.52 Decreased By ▼ -0.48 (-1.2%)
AIRLINK 129.40 Increased By ▲ 0.34 (0.26%)
BOP 6.82 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.04%)
CNERGY 4.70 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (4.68%)
DCL 8.42 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-1.52%)
DFML 41.22 Increased By ▲ 0.40 (0.98%)
DGKC 81.60 Increased By ▲ 0.64 (0.79%)
FCCL 32.91 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (0.43%)
FFBL 74.60 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (0.23%)
FFL 11.80 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.51%)
HUBC 109.89 Increased By ▲ 0.31 (0.28%)
HUMNL 14.25 Increased By ▲ 0.50 (3.64%)
KEL 5.28 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.56%)
KOSM 7.65 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.91%)
MLCF 38.65 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.13%)
NBP 64.90 Increased By ▲ 1.39 (2.19%)
OGDC 193.10 Decreased By ▼ -1.59 (-0.82%)
PAEL 25.83 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (0.47%)
PIBTL 7.42 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.41%)
PPL 153.25 Decreased By ▼ -2.20 (-1.42%)
PRL 25.59 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-0.78%)
PTC 17.51 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.06%)
SEARL 79.10 Increased By ▲ 0.45 (0.57%)
TELE 7.78 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-1.02%)
TOMCL 33.75 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.06%)
TPLP 8.57 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (2.02%)
TREET 16.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.43%)
TRG 57.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.32 (-0.55%)
UNITY 27.55 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.22%)
WTL 1.39 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
BR100 10,604 Increased By 158.7 (1.52%)
BR30 31,216 Increased By 26.2 (0.08%)
KSE100 99,024 Increased By 1226.1 (1.25%)
KSE30 30,969 Increased By 488.3 (1.6%)

The Sindh High Court (SHC) on Friday, through issuing a stay order to the City District Government Karachi (CDGK), barred it from collecting what the petitioner Ashraf Hussain, President of Pasban Karachi called it "illegal" public utility charges known as 'infrastructure tax'.
A division bench of SHC comprising Justice Gulzar Ahmed and Justice Irfan Saadat while issuing the stay order ordered Secretary, Local Government, Government of Sindh, CDGK, and Executive Director, Finance group of CDGK, to submit their comments in next hearing to be held on November 3.
Hussain, chief of Pasban Karachi, an NGO, who was represented by Advocate Abdul Waheed, had challenged the utility bill as "illegal and unconstitutional", contending that the citizens were already paying the utility bills under various heads, like income tax, property tax, fire and conservancy tax, development charges, professional tax etc.
The petitioner had made the Sindh Government and CDGK a party to the case. A.A.G Adnan representing the Sindh Government requested the court for more time to submit the comments while any legal advisor/ advocate from CDGK did not participate in the Friday's hearing.
The petitioner contended that the poverty stricken people who are already paying many utility bills of water, gas, electricity, telephone and others, the CDGK has sprinkled oil on the fire by imposing the a new tax which is already to be used to sustain the rapid development taking place in the city. It said the key aspect of the CDGK's new policy is that any real estate dealing, be it sale, purchase, or transfer, can not go ahead until the clearance of all outstanding dues of infrastructure tax.
It further said there had been a great hue and cry against the imposition of said tax by the city government both from the general public as well as the business community. The levy of the above tax is beyond the authority of the Sindh Government, uncalled for, unjust, unfair, in violation of fundamental rights of the people in as much as against principles of natural justice as also against public interest.
It said the unrest among the people of the city has been time and again brought to the notice of the respondent through publication as well as demonstration. It appears that the government has no mind to appreciate the situation and withdraw the tax.
The petitioner prayed to the court to declare the infrastructure tax imposed by CDGK illegal, unfair, unjust, in violation of fundamental rights of the people against the public interest and also against natural justice.
It was also prayed to the court to direct the respondents to withdraw the above tax immediately. The petitioner further prayed to the court to award cost of petition and grand any other relief which the honourable court deems fit and proper and in the interest of justice.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2009

Comments

Comments are closed.