AGL 38.16 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.16%)
AIRLINK 134.19 Increased By ▲ 5.22 (4.05%)
BOP 8.85 Increased By ▲ 1.00 (12.74%)
CNERGY 4.69 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.64%)
DCL 8.67 Increased By ▲ 0.35 (4.21%)
DFML 39.78 Increased By ▲ 0.84 (2.16%)
DGKC 85.15 Increased By ▲ 3.21 (3.92%)
FCCL 34.90 Increased By ▲ 1.48 (4.43%)
FFBL 75.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-0.15%)
FFL 12.74 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.62%)
HUBC 109.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.91 (-0.82%)
HUMNL 14.10 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (0.64%)
KEL 5.40 Increased By ▲ 0.25 (4.85%)
KOSM 7.75 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (1.04%)
MLCF 41.37 Increased By ▲ 1.57 (3.94%)
NBP 69.70 Decreased By ▼ -2.62 (-3.62%)
OGDC 193.62 Increased By ▲ 5.33 (2.83%)
PAEL 26.21 Increased By ▲ 0.58 (2.26%)
PIBTL 7.42 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.68%)
PPL 163.85 Increased By ▲ 11.18 (7.32%)
PRL 26.36 Increased By ▲ 0.97 (3.82%)
PTC 19.47 Increased By ▲ 1.77 (10%)
SEARL 84.40 Increased By ▲ 1.98 (2.4%)
TELE 7.99 Increased By ▲ 0.40 (5.27%)
TOMCL 34.05 Increased By ▲ 1.48 (4.54%)
TPLP 8.72 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (3.56%)
TREET 17.18 Increased By ▲ 0.40 (2.38%)
TRG 61.00 Increased By ▲ 4.96 (8.85%)
UNITY 28.96 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (0.63%)
WTL 1.37 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (1.48%)
BR100 10,786 Increased By 127.6 (1.2%)
BR30 32,266 Increased By 934.6 (2.98%)
KSE100 100,083 Increased By 813.5 (0.82%)
KSE30 31,193 Increased By 160.9 (0.52%)

The captioned letters in your esteemed daily reveals an eye-catching scam of 200 billion rupees. Malpractice, over a decade back, when importers paid unwittingly, unwarranted, illegal charges has assumed the proportion of a scam, making importers conscious of exploitation. But, the authorities are unmoved.
Apathy to the scam of this magnitude is evidence of official patronage for unabashed, illegal recoveries. I dare say that the high-ups contrived and manoeuvred to (i) merge all the charges and rename it "Logistic" charges (ii) legitimise illegal charges, through dubious means (iii) shunted and rotated the issue to and between Revenue Division, Ministry of Commerce, Ministry of Ports and Shipping (iv) obviated addressing the issue through the ineffective Shipping Rates Advisory Board, constituted in 2001 and now through the proposed futile Shipping Rates Advisory Committee to "regulate shipping rates" that it not applicable at all.
The issue is simple: Adhere to applicable law, rules and procedures; but it is tactically made complicated, confused to not resolve it. Licensees of KPT/Ministry of Ports & Shipping blatantly recovered charges not applicable or recovered excess than applicable and specified in the Schedule of Charges under the KPT Act.
The Wafaqi Mohtasib (Ombudsman) in his findings dated 31.5.2008 observed: "The Terminal Operators cannot change, on their own, any rates without the approval of the Agency. "The Agency is duty-bound to ensure that the charges, which have been fixed as per Implementation Agreement, are strictly adhered to". But, the findings are yet to be implemented, which proves that either the Agency is above the law or is impotent, or the Terminal Operators are defying lawful orders and have powerful backing.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2010

Comments

Comments are closed.