AGL 38.00 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.03%)
AIRLINK 210.38 Decreased By ▼ -5.15 (-2.39%)
BOP 9.48 Decreased By ▼ -0.32 (-3.27%)
CNERGY 6.48 Decreased By ▼ -0.31 (-4.57%)
DCL 8.96 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-2.29%)
DFML 38.37 Decreased By ▼ -0.59 (-1.51%)
DGKC 96.92 Decreased By ▼ -3.33 (-3.32%)
FCCL 36.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.30 (-0.82%)
FFBL 88.94 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
FFL 14.95 Increased By ▲ 0.46 (3.17%)
HUBC 130.69 Decreased By ▼ -3.44 (-2.56%)
HUMNL 13.29 Decreased By ▼ -0.34 (-2.49%)
KEL 5.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-3.34%)
KOSM 6.93 Decreased By ▼ -0.39 (-5.33%)
MLCF 44.78 Decreased By ▼ -1.09 (-2.38%)
NBP 59.07 Decreased By ▼ -2.21 (-3.61%)
OGDC 230.13 Decreased By ▼ -2.46 (-1.06%)
PAEL 39.29 Decreased By ▼ -1.44 (-3.54%)
PIBTL 8.31 Decreased By ▼ -0.27 (-3.15%)
PPL 200.35 Decreased By ▼ -2.99 (-1.47%)
PRL 38.88 Decreased By ▼ -1.93 (-4.73%)
PTC 26.88 Decreased By ▼ -1.43 (-5.05%)
SEARL 103.63 Decreased By ▼ -4.88 (-4.5%)
TELE 8.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.29 (-3.32%)
TOMCL 35.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.58 (-1.62%)
TPLP 13.52 Decreased By ▼ -0.32 (-2.31%)
TREET 25.01 Increased By ▲ 0.63 (2.58%)
TRG 64.12 Increased By ▲ 2.97 (4.86%)
UNITY 34.52 Decreased By ▼ -0.32 (-0.92%)
WTL 1.78 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (3.49%)
BR100 12,096 Decreased By -150 (-1.22%)
BR30 37,715 Decreased By -670.4 (-1.75%)
KSE100 112,415 Decreased By -1509.6 (-1.33%)
KSE30 35,508 Decreased By -535.7 (-1.49%)

The Chief Justice of Lahore High Court on Thursday sought assistance of the law officer on a law point whether or not a notice through chairman union council concerned was mandatory for execution of divorce. The chief justice was hearing a bail petition of Kamran Ahmad involved in a case lodged under Hadood ordinance by Abdul Qadir with police station Urban Area, Sargodha.
The complainant said he had married Kaneez Akhter and out of this wedlock a boy Usman was born, who was seven years of old now. He alleged that his wife developed illicit relations with the petitioner Kamran who was their neighbour. And after sometime the accused abducted his wife but later on he came to know that Kaneez declaring herself virgin entered into marriage with the accused/Kamran and their nikah was solemnised on August 8, 2003. The FIR was registered against both Kamran and Kaneez, however, the lady obtained bail from the High Court.
On Thursday, petitioner's counsel argued that the complainant Abdul Qadir had divorced her wife orally in the presence of many family members. He said the petitioner legally contracted marriage with Kaneez Akhter and had two children out of this wedlock.
The counsel relying upon a case "Allah Dad vs Mukhtar etc" in shariat appellate bench of Supreme Court (1992 SC/1273) wherein the court had held that there was no need of giving a notice to chairman union council concerned for the execution of divorce and according to "Shariah Muhammadi" there was also no need of giving notice but even orally "Talaq" pronounced by the husband could be sufficient.
The counsel pointed out that the complainant was disturbing the peaceful matrimonial life of the petitioner on malafide intention, which also reflected from one-month delay in registration of FIR after the solemnisation of nikah. After hearing the arguments the chief justice directed additional Advocate General Muhammad Hanif Khatana to assist the court in the matter and also directed police to produce the complaint on September 16.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2010

Comments

Comments are closed.