AGL 40.01 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-0.5%)
AIRLINK 127.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.64 (-0.5%)
BOP 6.69 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.3%)
CNERGY 4.51 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (1.35%)
DCL 8.64 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-1.03%)
DFML 41.04 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-0.29%)
DGKC 85.61 Decreased By ▼ -0.50 (-0.58%)
FCCL 33.11 Increased By ▲ 0.55 (1.69%)
FFBL 66.10 Increased By ▲ 1.72 (2.67%)
FFL 11.55 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.52%)
HUBC 111.11 Decreased By ▼ -1.35 (-1.2%)
HUMNL 14.82 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.07%)
KEL 5.17 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (2.58%)
KOSM 7.66 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (4.08%)
MLCF 40.21 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-0.3%)
NBP 60.51 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-0.93%)
OGDC 194.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.04%)
PAEL 26.72 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-0.71%)
PIBTL 7.37 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (1.24%)
PPL 153.79 Increased By ▲ 1.11 (0.73%)
PRL 26.21 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.04%)
PTC 17.18 Increased By ▲ 1.04 (6.44%)
SEARL 85.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.12%)
TELE 7.57 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-1.3%)
TOMCL 34.39 Decreased By ▼ -2.08 (-5.7%)
TPLP 8.82 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.34%)
TREET 16.82 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.12%)
TRG 62.55 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-0.3%)
UNITY 27.29 Decreased By ▼ -0.91 (-3.23%)
WTL 1.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-2.99%)
BR100 10,113 Increased By 27.5 (0.27%)
BR30 31,179 Increased By 9.1 (0.03%)
KSE100 94,996 Increased By 232 (0.24%)
KSE30 29,481 Increased By 71 (0.24%)

The World Trade Organisation adopted a ruling on Tuesday condemning controversial European duties on electronics products after the European Union declined to appeal against the verdict by WTO judges. The United States, Japan and Taiwan had challenged the EU tariffs on flat-panel displays, multi-function printers and television set-top boxes which they said violated the WTO's Information Technology Agreement.
Accepting some aspects of the finding, the EU renewed its call for a reform of the agreement, which eliminates duties on some information technology (IT) goods to foster trade in them, adding that further litigation was counter-productive.
"Litigation on a small set of products should never divert attention from negotiations on a broad set of products, not to mention all the other issues that still need to be agreed ... to further liberalise trade in IT products," an EU diplomat told a session of the WTO's dispute settlement body.
US trade officials estimated worldwide trade in the three products at $44 billion in 2009, and the EU's 27 member states imported $7 billion worth of the products that year. The 1996 agreement, which is voluntary, abolished tariffs among 72 countries on certain electronics products. But the EU had argued that added functionality since the agreement was reached meant some products were now consumer goods rather than information technology of the kind the agreement was intended to encourage.
For example it said that flat-panel computer displays could now serve as television screens. But a Japanese diplomat told the WTO meeting that IT products should not be treated less favourably or penalised "simply because, with additional features and functions, they have become smarter, more sophisticated and more advanced".
A US official said the ruling provided an important foundation for further negotiations on duty-free treatment of additional electronics products in the Doha round to open world trade - a key goal of Washington in the long-running talks.
Taiwan's WTO ambassador, Yi-fu Lin, welcomed the adoption of the ruling, saying the products involved made up a significant part of the island's trade and were vital for its economy. US electronics producers like Hewlett-Packard, Motorola and Cisco unit Scientific Atlantic and Asian producers like South Korea's Samsung and LG Display or Taiwan's AU Optronics had been waiting to see whether Brussels would challenge the WTO ruling.
In another dispute, the EU and United States told the WTO committee they would extend efforts to agree on how Washington implements a WTO ruling that faulted its method of calculating duties on unfairly-priced imports, delaying the prospect of EU sanctions.
The dispute body set up a panel at Mexico's request to examine whether the United States was complying with an earlier WTO ruling in a separate dispute on the same issue.

Copyright Reuters, 2010

Comments

Comments are closed.