AGL 40.05 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-0.4%)
AIRLINK 127.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.64 (-0.5%)
BOP 6.68 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.15%)
CNERGY 4.53 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (1.8%)
DCL 8.62 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-1.26%)
DFML 40.86 Decreased By ▼ -0.30 (-0.73%)
DGKC 85.79 Decreased By ▼ -0.32 (-0.37%)
FCCL 33.02 Increased By ▲ 0.46 (1.41%)
FFBL 64.36 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.03%)
FFL 11.67 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.52%)
HUBC 111.99 Decreased By ▼ -0.47 (-0.42%)
HUMNL 15.23 Increased By ▲ 0.42 (2.84%)
KEL 5.20 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (3.17%)
KOSM 7.55 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (2.58%)
MLCF 40.40 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.17%)
NBP 61.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.13%)
OGDC 192.45 Decreased By ▼ -1.73 (-0.89%)
PAEL 26.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-0.41%)
PIBTL 7.45 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (2.34%)
PPL 153.80 Increased By ▲ 1.12 (0.73%)
PRL 26.35 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (0.5%)
PTC 17.38 Increased By ▲ 1.24 (7.68%)
SEARL 86.15 Increased By ▲ 0.45 (0.53%)
TELE 7.70 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.39%)
TOMCL 33.90 Decreased By ▼ -2.57 (-7.05%)
TPLP 8.86 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.8%)
TREET 17.19 Increased By ▲ 0.35 (2.08%)
TRG 64.42 Increased By ▲ 1.68 (2.68%)
UNITY 27.94 Decreased By ▼ -0.26 (-0.92%)
WTL 1.29 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-3.73%)
BR100 10,103 Increased By 17.9 (0.18%)
BR30 31,207 Increased By 36.8 (0.12%)
KSE100 94,969 Increased By 205.5 (0.22%)
KSE30 29,460 Increased By 49.6 (0.17%)

Formerly known as "Askari Commercial Bank Limited", Askari Bank Limited was incorporated in Pakistan on October 09, 1991 and commenced its operations in April 1992 as a public limited company.
The bank is listed on all the three stock exchanges of Pakistan. The bank has a network of 200 branches (2007: 150 branches); 199 in Pakistan and Azad Jammu and Kashmir, including 18 Islamic banking branches. The bank is principally engaged in the banking business. It has a diverse customer base comprising of corporate, SMEs, individual savers, households and farmers. Askari Investment Management Limited (AIM) is the wholly owned subsidiary of Askari Bank. The bank also has an Offshore Banking Unit in Bahrain.



=======================================
KSE Symbol AKBL
=======================================
Current Stock price Rs 14.10
Profit after tax (Rs) Rs 714,221,000
Outstanding Shares 642743940
Market Capitalization 9904684115.4
=======================================

RECENT RESULTS 1H10
Askari Bank showed an improved performance in first half of 2010. The deposit base increased marginally by 8% in the first half of FY10. Growing remittances in FY09, is a positive sign for the bank for the increase in the deposit and other accounts. The deposits for 1H10 augmented from Rs 205,970,227 to Rs 221,761, 594
In 1H10, investments showed an increase of 17% compared to 1H09, where available for sale securities showed a high increase as the Investments Given as Collateral increased from Rs 4,515,246 to Rs 8,025,524.
Non-performing advances totalled to Rs 19.5bn. With the majority of the portion considered LOSS. The FSV benefit has resulted in reduced charge for specific provision for the half year by Rs 82,565 thousand.



===============================================================
Category of Classification of Non Performing Advances June 2010
===============================================================
Domestic
---------------------------------------------------------------
Other Assets Especially Mentioned - note 9.5.1 88,828
Substandard 1,797,830
Doubtful 1,369,441
Loss 16,241, 896
Total 19, 497, 995
===============================================================

During the half year under review, bank's operating profit stood at Rs 2,375 million, registering a decline of 6% as compared to the corresponding period last year. This was mainly due to increase in revenues outpaced by increase in administrative expenses. During the period, net mark-up-based and aggregate non-mark-up-based revenues increased by 6% each, while the administrative expenses increased by 15% over the corresponding period last year, mainly due to increase in the number of branches from 205 as on June 30, 2009 to 227 at the close of the half year under review. Askari Bank registered After-tax of Rs 714,221 compared to Rs 585,231 in 1H09, thereby recording a growth of 22%.
Bank's major contributing asset remains Advances mounting to Rs 144,884,086 compared to 1H09 of Rs 135,039,901, showing an increase of 7%. However the increase in NPLs has offset the increase in Advances as the NPLs mount to a total of Rs 19,497,995, showing NPLs to advances ratio to increase to 13% in 1H10.
The other two earning assets have also shown an increase in 1H10 as the Lending to Financial Institutions increased by 42%, along with Investments increased by 17%. The majority of investments remain available for sale securities.
During the half-year review of 2010, Askari Bank improved on its liquidity condition. The performance improved in the second quarter of 2010. The 1H10 earning assets to assets increased to 82%, along with Yield on earning assets increasing to 6% compared to 1Q10 of 3%. The advance to deposits remain at 65%, showing a decline in the funding base side of the bank. This would create a concern in future lending of the bank.
Bank's performance is reflected in its solvency ratios where it maintained a healthy position. Where the equity to assets still stood at 6% and the earning assets to deposits increased to 104%.
BANKING INDUSTRY DURING FY08-09
In the last quarter, the banking system successfully weathered a liquidity stress. The stress emerged in usual timeframe ie Eid-ul-Fitr deposit withdrawal and a number of global, domestic and industry-specific factors further compounded it. Major dampening factors like global financial turmoil, economic slowdown and contractionary monetary policy were compounded by an unusual liquidity stress during October-November 2008. The current account deficit was quite high and the real exchange rate had significantly appreciated to unsustainable levels which ultimately put pressure on PKR/US $ exchange rate and led to capital outflows.
On top of it, breakdown of capital market in Pakistan and the series of news on the financial meltdown in the advanced markets raised general public doubts about the financial strength of some Pakistani banks. By this time, due to relatively higher growth in advances, the liquidity profiles of the banks had already been burdened. In this backdrop, the usual post-Eid liquidity pressure in interbank market led to rumour-mongering about the banks. The impact was severe in some banks especially the small banks with the constrained liquidity profile in terms of ADR.
The reduction in Cash Reserve Requirements (CRR) and Statutory Liquidity Requirements (SLR) requirements in early weeks of October 2008 to manage the liquidity stress resulted in a significant decline in cash and treasury bank balances by the end of December-08 quarter thus releasing funds for financing the growth of advances.
However, strong capacity developed by the banks and regulators over the years and the offsetting measures taken by the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) enabled the system to avert this transitory stress from converting into a financial crisis.
Conditions in FY09 continued to be a misery for the banks, however there was a marginal increase in the shareholders return to 9%. Continuing NPLs issue led to alarming checks on the asset quality of banks and reducing of gross advances for the period. The CAR (capital adequacy requirement) was up to 14.0% for the industry average as it gave a positive position of banks in the current economic condition.
INVESTMENTS
The investments, especially the government papers, which declined in both absolute rupee terms as well as a proportion of total assets during the first nine months of CY08, registered a slight increase during the last quarter. Actually, the heightened credit risk on account of deterioration in macroeconomic fundamentals and already constrained liquidity profile induced the banks to shift their preference towards risk-free Market Treasury Bills (MTBs).
The banking system is marked with a high concentration as a small number of banks hold a major share of the system's total assets and deposits. This concentration has been following an overall declining trend as the medium sized banks gradually gained market share. However, due to unusual liquidity stress that affected mainly the small and medium sized banks, the market share of five large banks inched up to 52.4 percent (51.3 percent in September-08).
In FY09, much of the investments were geared towards government's revenue-expenditure gap. The investments (read government borrowing) increased by Rs 659 billion (68%) in 2009 (Industry review, Business Recorder, 2010).
DEPOSITS
The deposit component, which used to witness a strong growth in last quarter, registered a slow growth of Rs 153 billion (3.8 percent) this year. Incidentally, foreign remittances, a key factor behind the recent year's strong growth in deposits, maintained the momentum and grew by 17 percent over the CY08.
The industry has been witnessing a gradual shift in deposits from savings to term deposits for quite some time. This trend emerged largely in response to SBP's policy incentives to encourage the mobilisation of longer-terms deposit so as to reduce the maturity mismatches. Consequently, fixed deposits gained a significant share of savings deposits since 2004. However, SBP's policy drive to increase the CRR and SLR in last week of Jun-08 and exemption of long-term deposits also from SLR requirements during the last quarter seem to have considerably invigorated this trend (Other factors like general rise in interest rates and innovative deposits scheme have also augmented depositors preference for terms deposits).
In 2009, the deposits of banking system increased by Rs 521 billion (14%), out of which only Rs 121 billion on net basis were deployed in advances, as virtually all the incremental supply was used to plug the government revenue-expenditure gap.
ADVANCES
During the quarter under review, Advances witnessed a significant slowdown in sharp contrast to industry's established patterns for the last quarter. The worsening business and economic environment somewhat increased the credit risk, which compelled the banks to adopt cautious lending strategy, particularly in consumer sector where the advances have been decreasing since the start of CY08.some new loans have been issued of which a significant portion of these were disbursed to public sector enterprises (PSEs).
CY08 however observed a deviation in the growth pattern of advances. Slackness in the demand for bank credit during CY07 coupled with slowdown in economic activities and tightening of monetary regime, forced the banks to reposition their lending strategy and asset profile. The asset mix of the banking system gradually shifted from lending to investments during the first three quarters of CY07
FY09, for the first nine months banks were reluctant to lend to corporate and individuals owing to skyrocketing bad loans amid lack of demand from industries who were avoiding high financial charges. But, with some sign of economic recovery, lately, with inflation tapering off amid marginal growth in large-scale manufacturing (LSM) sector, the demand for corporate credit gradually rose. However, attractive rates offered by government bonds still remain lucrative enough - wooing banks to put depositors' money in low risk papers instead of meeting the demand of private sector (Industry review, Business Recorder, 2010).
PROFITABILITY
Currently, the cumulative profit of 22 listed commercial banks has declined by 21% to Rs 50.3 billion in the year 2008 as compared to Rs 63.6 billion earned in the same period in 2007, mainly due to higher provisions for non-performing loans (NPLs) and impairment loss.
The full year profits of CY08 were however lower than profits for the last couple of years but still it remained profitable. The overall profitability was neutralizing due to more than proportionate increase in operating expenses and provisioning for loan losses. In absolute terms, expenses increased by 33.4 percent to Rs 235.8 billion in CY08, which affected the overall profitability of the system. In addition to higher provisions, enhanced branch network with increased human resource base has soared the expense of the system during the last quarter under review. Moreover, stock market crash in the second half of 2008 resulted in bank recognizing impairment loss of Rs 12 billion as against only Rs 287 million recognised in 2007.
High spreads of 7.29% in 2008 and strong advances growth of 19% supported the net interest income, while non-interest income increased by 11% on the back of surge in exchange gain as rupee remained volatile against the dollar. The annual audited results of the top five banks for the year 2008 show that their profitability on average has remained at the previous year's level. The assets distribution on the basis of ROA shows that 16 banks, holding 67.9 percent market share, have ROA of one percent and below.
The banking sector in Pakistan has remained somewhat insulated from the global financial turmoil and has maintained its profitability albeit the slower growth. The prevailing global economic downturn nevertheless has the potential to impair corporate and business profitability that may ultimately heighten the credit risk and may affect the earnings of the banking sector in the quarters ahead.
NPLs
This rise in NPLs observed across all the banking groups except specialized banks, where NPLs have actually decreased. NPLs have been on the rise mainly due to poor economic performance of the economy and the FSV benefit therefore resulting in worsening of asset quality ratios.
Total provisions for NPLs surged to Rs 53 billion in 2008 as against Rs 42 billion in 2007, an astounding growth of 27% largely due to slowdown in economic growth. The composition of segment wise NPLs of the banking system shows that infection ratio of all the segments except agriculture have increased. The infection ratio of consumer finance portfolio increased in CY08 (2.3 percent over the year). Rising inflation and contained disposable incomes coupled with increasing lending rate have reduced consumers' appetite for credit as well as their repayment capacity, resulting in increasing defaults rate in the consumer finance. Interestingly, in the wake of economic slowdown, banks seem to facilitate the businesses through rescheduling/restructuring of loans; the textile sector being the major beneficiary. Latest banking industry numbers show an effort to keep balance sheets clear of NPLs by recognizing and providing for NPLs on criteria that are more stringent. This approach might look costly in the meantime but in the long run it'll definitely benefit banks by providing a cushion to withstand losses.
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE
In the year ending December 2008, the bank realized a Profit after tax of Rs 386 million which is less by 86% over last year (2007: PAT Rs 2.681 billion). These major reductions in profits are attributable to increases in non-mark-up expenses and reductions in non-mark-up income.
On a closer analysis we find that net interest earned in this year has increased by 20% but this effect is diluted as we move down the income statement. The non-mark-up income was down by 41% chiefly contributed by seizure in investments gains to half as compared to FY07. Along with these, some positive changes are seen in income from fee and commission (17% growth) and dividend income (27% growth). To match this income, Non-interest expenses grew more than proportionately by 23% dominated by administration expenses. Admin expenses included salaries, which were high due to double-digit inflation adjustment in FY08.
On the balance sheet front the Net Assets grew by 6%. Earning assets (Advances, Lendings to financial institutions and investments) form the majority of assets in any bank. Over the years we see a shift in composition of these earnings assets. In the last year, FY08, the Lendings to financial institutions fell drastically which is quite apparent in the graph. Only probable reason for this change is the rising interest rates in FY08 and also that banks maintained their spread (around 7%) coupled with troubled economy where businesses were shutting down. Advances gained this year with a total growth of 28%, which is impressive considering the banking industry. On a closer look majority of the lendings were on a shorter-term basis reason being the poor economic conditions and shorter term advances helps in risk aversion. When talking of advances, NPLs come complimentary. The NPLs growth, 69%, this year has been highest compared to industry. This is a threat to Banks profitability and may restrain further lending.
Askari Bank was able to post a After-tax net income of Rs 1.18bn in FY09, which is 187% increase from FY08. The bank has been able to accomplish this through various ways. Its Year-on-Year mark-up interest income increased by 23% mounting to Rs 22bn in FY09. Following this, we observed that there was a huge increase in the particulars of provision for impairment in value of investments by 1500% as the amounted augmented to Rs 76,784m in FY09 compared to Rs 5m in FY08, this was due to the charges for the year that were charged on the investments made by the bank. Second was the increase in the Gain on Sale of Investments, which increased by 291% amounting to Rs 143m in which two main particulars have to be pointed out.



===============================================================
GAIN ON SALE OF INVESTMENTS - NET (000s) 2009 2008
===============================================================
Market Treasury Bills 62,177 266
Shares - Listed 47,015 6,682
===============================================================

Such high increase in sale of investments has yielded in high profits for the bank for the FY09.
The scenario of the NPLs does not seem very favorable for the bank. The NPLs have consistently seen an increase, indicating that the bank is either not very efficient at collecting the outstanding loans or has a very liberal loan distribution policy. Their pace of growth has outdone the rate of increase in advances. The bank may face considerable credit risk from its loan defaulters.
In FY06, bank's advances witnessed marginal increases in consumer finances, especially Ijara financing, corporate financing while they observed a slight decline in the shares of SME and agriculture.
The assets of the bank witnessed some shift in their composition away from loans towards investments. This has also been the trend industry wide to meet the MCR requirements as directed by the State Bank of Pakistan. Though these investments offer lower returns than the loans, they are more preferable in this situation for the bank as it is struggling to collect its loans.
In FY09, the bank maintained its marginal increase of lending to financial institutions as it only increased by 3%, similarly the Advances too is seen as controlled lending as it also increased by a mere 5%. The reasons tend to be the same as it were in the previous year. Low Advances because of high NPLs rising from consumer banking and also from certain sectors of the economy especially the textile sector.
However, on the flip side, we see a dramatic increase of 88% of investments, which amounted to Rs 135bn. The investments category is further broken down to see where are investments done.



===============================================================
2009 2008
===============================================================
Market Treasury Bills (Government) 37,742,897 16,043,454
Unlisted Term Finance Certificates 12,615,735 6,485,385
===============================================================

Much can be observed that the investments are done marketable securities issued by government. This is mainly done to cover the revenue-expenditure gap of the fiscal deficit. This condition has led to government borrowing from the private sector and less from SBP. Therefore the much of investments done is basically of government securities.
The liquidity of the bank has maintained a consistent upward trend, with its yield on earning assets always above the cost of funding them. It's imperative to notice that Cost and yield on funding earning assets run parallel which means that banks are not compromising on their spreads in years of performance regardless of dynamic economic conditions. This liquidity consistency in years until FY06 may be attributed to the excess liquidity that prevailed in the industry due to high reserve growth of the banking sector.
The State Bank of Pakistan intervened in this situation by contracting the monetary policy. Also, post emergency declaration when the rupee fell, SBP intervened twice to ease the liquidity conditions in the market. SBP has prudently managed the liquidity while the bank also has certain arrangements to maintain its liquidity. It has most of its investments in treasury bills. The liquidity position may be predicted to remain similar to the above in the coming years. However, at the same time Askari needs to safeguard its liquidity against the increasing NPLs.
Askari Bank was able to maintain its liquidity condition with keeping its ratios in-line with previous year FY08. The earning assets to assets remained at 81% as much of the percentage was due to the fact of an high increase of investments in the government securities. Subsequently, advances to deposits remain constant at 71% as the bank did not increase in its advances to consumers due to high NPL to advances in the previous year.
The bank's spread was sustained at 4% as it only decreased marginally by 1%. This was because the industry average remains to be at 5-6% for the FY09. This again helps us to understand the positivity of the bank in such recessionary condition that they are not compromising on their spread and maintaining at 4%.
The solvency of the company has been successfully maintained over the years. As evident, the share of equity is increasing. This may be regarded as a move against the rise in deposit rates and a decrease in the banking spread of the banking sector. This healthy trend in solvency may be predicted to continue in the future. The greater than earning assets deposits are the result of excess reserve money growth while the increase in the non-performing advances has undermined the advances performance. With the gradual shift to investments, we may expect the adverse impact of the NPLs to reduce, but this may take a long time.
The trend of maintaining healthy solvency was carried out even in FY09, as the equity to assets was maintained at 6.1%, along with this the earning assets to deposits remained 100%. This shows the asset based is well utilized by the bank and with the new trend to shift towards low risk investment of government securities. As observed more of the deposits are concerned with long-term deposits.
Asset quality has been improving since 2008. We saw a decrease in provisioning to NPLs in FY09, as it decreased by 7% from FY08. With the new regulation by SBP of keeping Forced Sale Value to 40%. The upcoming provisioning would be lower than the previous ones. The asset quality was also maintained as low advances were given to consumer as well as other corporate sectors, therefore the NPL to advances also stood still at 9% in FY09. Whereas the NPLs were still the same for the period but not increasing as can be seen through previous years.
Askari Bank maintained its asset quality by constraining its advances in 1Q10 and also due to FSV benefit lower provisions were charged in this quarter, however the NPLs still remain high at Rs 20bn, showing a cause of concern.
The market value of the company has shown a downward trend for the 1H10, as the confidence of the investors remained low due to political situation and uncertainty in the country. The recent flood crisis has adversely affected the stock index with many of stocks showing a downward trend.
In FY09, the market value rose after the nine months ending showing a late year push towards the recovery of the economy. As the investors gained confidence in the company, the results were shown as the EPS surged from Rs 0.95 to Rs 2.18 in FY09.
However the dividend payout remains very low, as low as 0.07%.
The bank has maintained its reputation as one of the consistent payers of dividends. This year the bank did not give any cash dividends rather it gave stock dividend, this would help bank in two ways, first, by maintaining liquidity and second by making up for the MCR requirements.
The bank was able to maintain a healthy 11.5% contrast to minimum requirement of 10%.
The required minimum capital requirement can be achieved by the bank either by fresh capital injection or retention of profits. The stock dividend declared will be counted towards the required paid up capital of the Bank pending completion of the formalities for issuance of bonus shares. The Bank intends to meet this requirement by way of bonus issue subsequent to balance sheet date, in this year.
FUTURE OUTLOOK
The banking industry can be seen positively as the some private credit increase is observed in the year-end of 2009 and started picking up.
With key policy rate at 13% the SBP maintains to keep a balance and wants to increase the circulation of the money in the economy and not keeping it tied up.
On the other hand, much of the investments still lie on the government securities as the government borrowing.
According to Moody's credit rating, Pakistani banks face a negative credit outlook. Main reason is the exposure to sovereign and public debt. Thereby reducing the chances of upgrading the rating.
However, Askari Bank keens on improving its position and maintain a healthy ratios and reserves in order to meet any shortcomings in future.
COURTESY: Economics and Finance Department, Institute of Business Administration, Karachi, prepared this analytical report for Business Recorder.
DISCLAIMER: No reliance should be placed on the [above information] by any one for making any financial, investment and business decision. The [above information] is general in nature and has not been prepared for any specific decision making process. [The newspaper] has not independently verified all of the [above information] and has relied on sources that have been deemed reliable in the past. Accordingly, the newspaper or any its staff or sources of information do not bear any liability or responsibility of any consequences for decisions or actions based on the [above information].
Copyright Business Recorder, 2010

Comments

Comments are closed.