AGL 36.58 Decreased By ▼ -1.42 (-3.74%)
AIRLINK 215.74 Increased By ▲ 1.83 (0.86%)
BOP 9.48 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.64%)
CNERGY 6.52 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (3.66%)
DCL 8.61 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-1.82%)
DFML 41.04 Decreased By ▼ -1.17 (-2.77%)
DGKC 98.98 Increased By ▲ 4.86 (5.16%)
FCCL 36.34 Increased By ▲ 1.15 (3.27%)
FFBL 88.94 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
FFL 17.08 Increased By ▲ 0.69 (4.21%)
HUBC 126.34 Decreased By ▼ -0.56 (-0.44%)
HUMNL 13.44 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.52%)
KEL 5.23 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-1.51%)
KOSM 6.83 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-1.59%)
MLCF 44.10 Increased By ▲ 1.12 (2.61%)
NBP 59.69 Increased By ▲ 0.84 (1.43%)
OGDC 221.10 Increased By ▲ 1.68 (0.77%)
PAEL 40.53 Increased By ▲ 1.37 (3.5%)
PIBTL 8.08 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-1.22%)
PPL 191.53 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-0.07%)
PRL 38.55 Increased By ▲ 0.63 (1.66%)
PTC 27.00 Increased By ▲ 0.66 (2.51%)
SEARL 104.33 Increased By ▲ 0.33 (0.32%)
TELE 8.63 Increased By ▲ 0.24 (2.86%)
TOMCL 34.96 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (0.6%)
TPLP 13.70 Increased By ▲ 0.82 (6.37%)
TREET 24.89 Decreased By ▼ -0.45 (-1.78%)
TRG 73.55 Increased By ▲ 3.10 (4.4%)
UNITY 33.27 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-0.36%)
WTL 1.71 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.58%)
BR100 11,987 Increased By 93.1 (0.78%)
BR30 37,178 Increased By 323.2 (0.88%)
KSE100 111,351 Increased By 927.9 (0.84%)
KSE30 35,039 Increased By 261 (0.75%)

The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has empowered all officials of Inland Revenue, authorised by the concerned commissioner, to direct taxpayers for submitting tax records/documents to conduct sales tax audit under section 25 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990.
In this connection, the FBR has issued a clarification to the Large Taxpayer Unit (LTU), Islamabad. Sources told Business Recorder that the LTU Islamabad had approached the FBR for obtaining necessary clarification on the provision of section 25 of the Sales Tax Act 1990 as amended by Finance Act 2010. Under section 25 of the Sales Tax Act, registered person is bound to submit record, documents or electronic data whenever required by the officials of the Inland Revenue. However, some questions had been raised by the LTU Islamabad regarding audit under section 25 of the Act.
Following are the queries of the LTU Islamabad, and response of the FBR:
Query: Whether only commission can invoke provision of section 25 and require production of record from the person or any other officer authorised by him can also require production of record?
FBR clarification: The Commissioner of Inland Revenue, as well as any officer authorised by the Commissioner, can require production of record for audit u/s 25 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990. Query: Whether the authorisation accorded by Commissioner to the officer of Inland Revenue to conduct the audit is an internal correspondence and whether the person whose audit is to be conducted can acquire a copy of the authorisation order/approval?
FBR clarification: The person whose audit is to be conducted may request a copy of the audit authorisation by the Commissioner to an officer of Inland Revenue, which should be provided. However, there is no requirement under the law to routinely provide such authorisation to the taxpayer prior to start of audit. Query: Whether similar authorisation u/s 68 of the Federal Excise Act 2005 is also required from Commissioner for conducting audit u/s 68 of the Federal Excise Act, 2005 or only authorisation u/s 25 of Sales Tax Act, 1990 will suffice.
FBR clarification: Separate authorisations by the Commissioner to the officer of Inland Revenue, under section 25 of the Sales Tax Act as well as section 46 of the Federal Excise Act, 2005, are required for conduct of respective audits.
The above clarification is based on the legal parameters set by the statute. However, the current audit policy issued by Taxpayers Audit Wing may be consulted for uniformity in conduct of audit, the FBR added.

Copyright Reuters, 2010

Comments

Comments are closed.