AGL 40.00 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
AIRLINK 127.04 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
BOP 6.67 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
CNERGY 4.51 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
DCL 8.55 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
DFML 41.44 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
DGKC 86.85 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
FCCL 32.28 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
FFBL 64.80 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
FFL 10.25 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
HUBC 109.57 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
HUMNL 14.68 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
KEL 5.05 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
KOSM 7.46 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
MLCF 41.38 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
NBP 60.41 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
OGDC 190.10 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
PAEL 27.83 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
PIBTL 7.83 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
PPL 150.06 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
PRL 26.88 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
PTC 16.07 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
SEARL 86.00 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
TELE 7.71 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
TOMCL 35.41 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
TPLP 8.12 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
TREET 16.41 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
TRG 53.29 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
UNITY 26.16 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
WTL 1.26 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
BR100 10,010 Increased By 126.5 (1.28%)
BR30 31,023 Increased By 422.5 (1.38%)
KSE100 94,192 Increased By 836.5 (0.9%)
KSE30 29,201 Increased By 270.2 (0.93%)

An appellate bench of the Competition Commission of Pakistan (CCP) comprising Chairperson, Ms Rahat Kaunain Hassan and Member (M&A), Ms Vaddiya Khalil, held a hearing in respect of the proceedings initiated against Wateen Telecom and Defence Housing Authority (DHA).
According to a press release issued on Friday, upon request and being urged by Wateen's counsel, the bench granted 10 days for submission of reply to the CCP show cause notice and for furnishing documents required by the bench. The CCP had issued show cause notices to Wateen and DHA on 26 November 2010 for violating Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2010 by entering into an exclusive agreement for provision of telecommunication and media services for one of the phases of DHA.
It was pointed out during the hearing Wateen failed to submit documents that it was required by the bench in the previous hearing. On behalf of Wateen, legal concerns were raised regarding the jurisdiction of CCP and the retrospective effect of the competition law. Wateen's rationale for agreeing to an exclusive arrangement for a period of 30 years is the huge investment made by Wateen in respect of the project.
On the other hand, DHA in its submissions highlighted that Wateen has not been performing its obligations under the exclusive agreement and that DHA has been receiving complaints from its residents about the inefficiency of Wateen and would be keen that this exclusivity be withdrawn and is willing to amend the agreement.-PR

Copyright Business Recorder, 2011

Comments

Comments are closed.