AGL 38.44 Increased By ▲ 0.29 (0.76%)
AIRLINK 129.05 Increased By ▲ 3.98 (3.18%)
BOP 7.15 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (4.38%)
CNERGY 4.60 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (3.37%)
DCL 8.34 Increased By ▲ 0.43 (5.44%)
DFML 38.75 Increased By ▲ 1.41 (3.78%)
DGKC 80.50 Increased By ▲ 2.73 (3.51%)
FCCL 32.10 Increased By ▲ 1.52 (4.97%)
FFBL 74.40 Increased By ▲ 5.54 (8.05%)
FFL 12.35 Increased By ▲ 0.49 (4.13%)
HUBC 108.51 Increased By ▲ 4.01 (3.84%)
HUMNL 14.09 Increased By ▲ 0.60 (4.45%)
KEL 4.95 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (6.45%)
KOSM 7.66 Increased By ▲ 0.49 (6.83%)
MLCF 37.50 Increased By ▲ 1.06 (2.91%)
NBP 70.75 Increased By ▲ 4.83 (7.33%)
OGDC 189.90 Increased By ▲ 10.37 (5.78%)
PAEL 25.10 Increased By ▲ 0.67 (2.74%)
PIBTL 7.38 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (3.22%)
PPL 152.05 Increased By ▲ 8.35 (5.81%)
PRL 25.10 Increased By ▲ 0.78 (3.21%)
PTC 17.25 Increased By ▲ 0.85 (5.18%)
SEARL 81.02 Increased By ▲ 2.45 (3.12%)
TELE 7.51 Increased By ▲ 0.29 (4.02%)
TOMCL 32.70 Increased By ▲ 0.73 (2.28%)
TPLP 8.42 Increased By ▲ 0.29 (3.57%)
TREET 16.70 Increased By ▲ 0.57 (3.53%)
TRG 56.35 Increased By ▲ 1.69 (3.09%)
UNITY 27.85 Increased By ▲ 0.35 (1.27%)
WTL 1.34 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (3.88%)
BR100 10,439 Increased By 350.1 (3.47%)
BR30 30,852 Increased By 1343.5 (4.55%)
KSE100 98,161 Increased By 3586.6 (3.79%)
KSE30 30,620 Increased By 1175.5 (3.99%)

Income Tax Bar Association (ITBA) on Thursday termed the amendment made in Income Tax Ordinance (ITO), 2001 through S.R.O. 09(1)/2011 as draconian for taxpayers. In a letter to the high-ups in the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) said the board had made public the S.R.0. 09 (1)/2011 on January 6, 2011 to intimate active taxpayers regarding the proposed insertion of Rule 81 B.
The bar, after thorough examination of the proposed rule, is of the view that the said rule would affect every taxpayer across the country. Therefore, they have rejected the contents of the said S.R.O for the following reasons.
-- The functions and powers delegated under this S.R.O. have negated the various available provisions contained in the Income Tax Ordinance 2001.
-- The record and data of FBR is not updated properly and the web portal of PRAL faces numerous technical problems and the unwarranted use of this law will be disastrous and will have negative impact on the business activities of the existing taxpayers.
-- The Bar is of the opinion that the taxpayer once suspended will have to run from pillar to post and their request will not be accepted without gratification which is very rampant in tax departments.
-- This S.R.O will be considered a great tool to discourage the existing taxpayers as the element of harassment and high handedness cannot be ruled out while exercising the powers available in the proposed rule.
-- It is irony of fate that the FBR has failed to achieve the task of broadening the tax base, the use of this S.R.O will further depress the business activities of the existing taxpayers and will also be considered as detrimental to the policies of facilitation and mutual trust which has remained a policy matter of reforms.
When contacted Ali A Rahim, president ITBA, said this exercise was already practiced in Sales Tax regime but remained unsuccessful because of reactivation of any inactive taxpayer issue. He also warned the authority concerned that if the said amendment implemented, the whole taxation machinery would be choked.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2011

Comments

Comments are closed.