AGL 38.67 Increased By ▲ 0.52 (1.36%)
AIRLINK 128.80 Increased By ▲ 3.73 (2.98%)
BOP 7.10 Increased By ▲ 0.25 (3.65%)
CNERGY 4.54 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (2.02%)
DCL 8.30 Increased By ▲ 0.39 (4.93%)
DFML 38.50 Increased By ▲ 1.16 (3.11%)
DGKC 79.89 Increased By ▲ 2.12 (2.73%)
FCCL 32.25 Increased By ▲ 1.67 (5.46%)
FFBL 73.00 Increased By ▲ 4.14 (6.01%)
FFL 12.23 Increased By ▲ 0.37 (3.12%)
HUBC 109.15 Increased By ▲ 4.65 (4.45%)
HUMNL 13.85 Increased By ▲ 0.36 (2.67%)
KEL 4.87 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (4.73%)
KOSM 7.55 Increased By ▲ 0.38 (5.3%)
MLCF 37.45 Increased By ▲ 1.01 (2.77%)
NBP 69.60 Increased By ▲ 3.68 (5.58%)
OGDC 188.00 Increased By ▲ 8.47 (4.72%)
PAEL 25.00 Increased By ▲ 0.57 (2.33%)
PIBTL 7.32 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (2.38%)
PPL 151.00 Increased By ▲ 7.30 (5.08%)
PRL 24.95 Increased By ▲ 0.63 (2.59%)
PTC 17.15 Increased By ▲ 0.75 (4.57%)
SEARL 80.50 Increased By ▲ 1.93 (2.46%)
TELE 7.56 Increased By ▲ 0.34 (4.71%)
TOMCL 33.00 Increased By ▲ 1.03 (3.22%)
TPLP 8.48 Increased By ▲ 0.35 (4.31%)
TREET 16.68 Increased By ▲ 0.55 (3.41%)
TRG 56.21 Increased By ▲ 1.55 (2.84%)
UNITY 28.00 Increased By ▲ 0.50 (1.82%)
WTL 1.33 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (3.1%)
BR100 10,461 Increased By 371.9 (3.69%)
BR30 30,782 Increased By 1273.5 (4.32%)
KSE100 97,681 Increased By 3106.4 (3.28%)
KSE30 30,464 Increased By 1019.6 (3.46%)

The Lahore High Court (LHC) on Friday issued notice to Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) on an application for early hearing of appeal by fast bowler Shoaib Akhtar challenging one-and-a-half-year ban on playing cricket and a fine of Rs 7 million imposed on him by an appellate tribunal for violation of discipline. The Chief Justice LHC on July 3, 2008 giving an interim relief had allowed Shoaib Akhtar to participate in national or international cricket by suspending the ban.
The bowler through his counsel Abid Hasan Manto pleaded that the appellate tribunal of the PCB was not authorised to award such penalty because the same was not provided under the relevant law. The counsel submitted that the tribunal illegally passed the impugned order by relying upon two earlier orders given by two different disciplinary committees of PCB.
He pointed out that in October 2007 a disciplinary committee had imposed a ban of 13 matches on his client and fine of Rs 4 million on the charges of hitting a fellow cricketer in South Africa. Manto said the other committee passed order of life ban, which he challenged before the PCB tribunal. He said that imposing a life ban was completely ultra vires and illegal because it was not provided in any law, rule or policy of the board. He asserted that an illegal part of that order couldn't be relied upon either by disciplinary committee that imposed five years ban and by appellate tribunal which reduced it.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2011

Comments

Comments are closed.