AGL 35.05 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-0.43%)
AIRLINK 123.65 Increased By ▲ 0.42 (0.34%)
BOP 5.17 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (2.58%)
CNERGY 3.88 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.77%)
DCL 8.05 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-1.23%)
DFML 43.55 Decreased By ▼ -0.67 (-1.52%)
DGKC 74.50 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (0.2%)
FCCL 24.65 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (0.74%)
FFBL 48.74 Increased By ▲ 0.54 (1.12%)
FFL 8.91 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (1.48%)
HUBC 145.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.85 (-0.58%)
HUMNL 10.65 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-1.84%)
KEL 3.97 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.75%)
KOSM 8.01 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.13%)
MLCF 33.10 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (0.91%)
NBP 57.70 Increased By ▲ 0.55 (0.96%)
OGDC 144.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.50 (-0.34%)
PAEL 25.46 Decreased By ▼ -0.29 (-1.13%)
PIBTL 5.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.17%)
PPL 116.80 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
PRL 24.06 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.25%)
PTC 11.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.45%)
SEARL 59.00 Increased By ▲ 0.59 (1.01%)
TELE 7.48 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.13%)
TOMCL 41.54 Increased By ▲ 0.44 (1.07%)
TPLP 8.23 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.96%)
TREET 15.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.33%)
TRG 56.02 Increased By ▲ 0.82 (1.49%)
UNITY 27.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-0.54%)
WTL 1.31 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-2.24%)
BR100 8,637 Increased By 64.8 (0.76%)
BR30 27,264 Decreased By -12 (-0.04%)
KSE100 82,182 Increased By 722.7 (0.89%)
KSE30 26,061 Increased By 261 (1.01%)

Lahore High Court here Tuesday dismissed various petitions challenging removal of more than 100 assistance and deputy prosecutor generals. The court held that their appointment was a stopgap arrangement and valid only for a period until regular recruitment is done, through Punjab Public Service Commission.
The court further ruled that matter was also agitated in the Supreme Court and it was decided the officers would remain as APG and DPG until new recruitment made through PPSC, and that Punjab government had completed the process in accordance with the SC direction. All petitioners were given full opportunity to participate in the process but they either opted to stay way or failed to meet the criteria set by law.
The court further observed that initial appointments on regular basis could only be affected under the auspices of PPSC, while the petitioners were appointed without going into the process of law as no merit or transparency was observed at the time of their recruitment. The petitioners had argued that they were initially appointed as APG and DPG on contract basis for a period of three years (extendable on performance basis) under recruitment policy 2004.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2011

Comments

Comments are closed.