AIRLINK 196.10 Increased By ▲ 2.54 (1.31%)
BOP 10.06 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (1.11%)
CNERGY 7.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-1.01%)
FCCL 39.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.75 (-1.85%)
FFL 17.03 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (1.01%)
FLYNG 27.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.55 (-1.98%)
HUBC 133.81 Increased By ▲ 1.23 (0.93%)
HUMNL 14.13 Increased By ▲ 0.24 (1.73%)
KEL 4.66 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (1.3%)
KOSM 6.66 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.6%)
MLCF 47.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.45 (-0.95%)
OGDC 215.25 Increased By ▲ 1.34 (0.63%)
PACE 6.98 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.72%)
PAEL 42.15 Increased By ▲ 0.91 (2.21%)
PIAHCLA 17.18 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.17%)
PIBTL 8.53 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (1.43%)
POWER 9.70 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.62%)
PPL 184.20 Increased By ▲ 1.85 (1.01%)
PRL 42.84 Increased By ▲ 0.88 (2.1%)
PTC 25.10 Increased By ▲ 0.20 (0.8%)
SEARL 111.00 Increased By ▲ 4.16 (3.89%)
SILK 1.00 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (1.01%)
SSGC 44.11 Increased By ▲ 4.01 (10%)
SYM 17.84 Increased By ▲ 0.37 (2.12%)
TELE 8.99 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (1.7%)
TPLP 13.00 Increased By ▲ 0.25 (1.96%)
TRG 67.35 Increased By ▲ 0.40 (0.6%)
WAVESAPP 11.67 Increased By ▲ 0.34 (3%)
WTL 1.81 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (1.12%)
YOUW 3.98 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-2.21%)
BR100 12,226 Increased By 181.6 (1.51%)
BR30 36,946 Increased By 366 (1%)
KSE100 115,402 Increased By 1364 (1.2%)
KSE30 36,304 Increased By 509.5 (1.42%)

Chief Justice (CJ) Lahore High Court held that foreign ministry, federal and Punjab governments were linking every thing relating Raymond' case to the trial court proceedings, therefore, petitions against him were disposed of accordingly. The CJ said this in its detailed judgement in the petitions against Raymond, but said, "None of the petitions raised question of diplomatic immunity".
The CJ Ijaz Ahmed Chaudhry on March 14, two days before release of Raymond Davis by the trial court had disposed of the petitions filed by Asif Hussain, and advocates Ahmad Masood Gujar Javed Iqbal Jafree, Muhammad Azhar Siddique and Rana Ilumddin Ghazi.
The CJ quoting the relief sought by petitioners, noted that the petitions sought judicial inquiry as there was an apprehension of extending immunity to Raymond therefore authorities be directed not to release him from jail and his name be placed on Exit Control List.
In another petition, it was rayed that Raymond's real name is not known hence all the documents and other material recovered from his possession be ordered to be produced in the court. Another plea was that direction be issued to federal government not to interfere with the investigation of the criminal cases registered against Raymond and till conclusion of the trail of the cases against him, he be not shifted to any other place beyond the jurisdiction of the LHC.
The CJ held that replies on the identical petitions were called from the federal government. Deputy Attorney General (DAG) told that the real name of the accused was Raymond Allen Davis and he had come to Pakistan on business visa. Answering the question about his diplomatic status the DAG referred to a LHC order which said, 'the court has already taken cognisance of the matter and if any matter of immunity arises in future that can be determined by the court of law". The CJ therefore held that bench disposed of the petitions after addressing all main points raised by the petitioners.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2011

Comments

Comments are closed.