BML 4.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.41%)
BOP 14.71 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (1.1%)
CNERGY 7.03 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-1.13%)
CPHL 89.19 Increased By ▲ 0.43 (0.48%)
DCL 12.71 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.08%)
DGKC 186.45 Decreased By ▼ -3.76 (-1.98%)
FCCL 51.05 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-0.37%)
FFL 16.94 Decreased By ▼ -0.17 (-0.99%)
GCIL 27.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.11%)
HUBC 161.31 Decreased By ▼ -0.38 (-0.24%)
KEL 5.01 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.2%)
KOSM 7.07 Increased By ▲ 0.59 (9.1%)
LOTCHEM 21.39 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.09%)
MLCF 94.64 Decreased By ▼ -0.68 (-0.71%)
NBP 154.24 Increased By ▲ 1.17 (0.76%)
PAEL 43.66 Decreased By ▼ -0.34 (-0.77%)
PIAHCLA 19.67 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.41%)
PIBTL 11.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.33 (-2.86%)
POWER 15.13 Decreased By ▼ -0.24 (-1.56%)
PPL 178.52 Decreased By ▼ -1.72 (-0.95%)
PREMA 40.19 Decreased By ▼ -0.50 (-1.23%)
PRL 30.98 Decreased By ▼ -0.28 (-0.9%)
PTC 23.90 Increased By ▲ 0.65 (2.8%)
SNGP 116.34 Decreased By ▼ -0.55 (-0.47%)
SSGC 42.27 Increased By ▲ 1.71 (4.22%)
TELE 7.91 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-1.74%)
TPLP 9.96 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
TREET 24.66 Increased By ▲ 1.10 (4.67%)
TRG 55.67 Decreased By ▼ -0.33 (-0.59%)
WTL 1.42 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.7%)
BML 4.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.41%)
BOP 14.71 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (1.1%)
CNERGY 7.03 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-1.13%)
CPHL 89.19 Increased By ▲ 0.43 (0.48%)
DCL 12.71 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.08%)
DGKC 186.45 Decreased By ▼ -3.76 (-1.98%)
FCCL 51.05 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-0.37%)
FFL 16.94 Decreased By ▼ -0.17 (-0.99%)
GCIL 27.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.11%)
HUBC 161.31 Decreased By ▼ -0.38 (-0.24%)
KEL 5.01 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.2%)
KOSM 7.07 Increased By ▲ 0.59 (9.1%)
LOTCHEM 21.39 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.09%)
MLCF 94.64 Decreased By ▼ -0.68 (-0.71%)
NBP 154.24 Increased By ▲ 1.17 (0.76%)
PAEL 43.66 Decreased By ▼ -0.34 (-0.77%)
PIAHCLA 19.67 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.41%)
PIBTL 11.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.33 (-2.86%)
POWER 15.13 Decreased By ▼ -0.24 (-1.56%)
PPL 178.52 Decreased By ▼ -1.72 (-0.95%)
PREMA 40.19 Decreased By ▼ -0.50 (-1.23%)
PRL 30.98 Decreased By ▼ -0.28 (-0.9%)
PTC 23.90 Increased By ▲ 0.65 (2.8%)
SNGP 116.34 Decreased By ▼ -0.55 (-0.47%)
SSGC 42.27 Increased By ▲ 1.71 (4.22%)
TELE 7.91 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-1.74%)
TPLP 9.96 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
TREET 24.66 Increased By ▲ 1.10 (4.67%)
TRG 55.67 Decreased By ▼ -0.33 (-0.59%)
WTL 1.42 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.7%)
BR100 15,059 No Change 0 (0%)
BR30 42,931 No Change 0 (0%)
KSE100 148,815 No Change 0 (0%)
KSE30 45,206 No Change 0 (0%)

Calcium heart scans could help people lower their blood pressure and cholesterol levels, according to a new study on the controversial x-ray tests. Several professional groups are already pushing for more widespread use of the scans, yet they've never been shown to cut the risk that people will die from heart disease.
What's more, recent studies have found no evidence that screening healthy people's hearts will influence their lifestyle or medication (see Reuters Health story of March 18, 2011). This lack of encouraging data has led some experts to fear that computed tomography (CT) - a type of high-dose x-rays, which include calcium scans - might do more harm than good. For instance, a typical CT scan exposes patients to several millisieverts of radiation. Experts say that translates into about one extra case of cancer per 1,000 typical scans. For the new study, Dr Alan Rozanski of St. Luke's Roosevelt Hospital in New York and colleagues divided more than 2,100 healthy, middle-aged people into two groups. One got a calcium scan, the other didn't.
Both groups of participants had some risk factors for heart disease at the outset - such as high blood pressure or obesity, for instance - and got counselling on how to reduce their risk. Those who got scanned also went through their calcium scores with a nurse practitioner and received a copy of the scan that they could show their own doctor.

Copyright Reuters, 2011

Comments

Comments are closed.